EstatePass
Cost ApproachMEDIUM13.6% of exam

Improvements have a current cost new of $600,000, an effective age of 20 years and a total economic life of 50 years. There are no other deductions and no salvage value. By the straight-line age-life method, what is the depreciated cost of the improvements?

Correct Answer

C) $360,000

Age-life depreciation=600000×20÷50=240000; remainder=600000−240000−0+0=360000. Common errors: reporting the depreciation instead of the depreciated amount gives $240,000; stopping at cost new, before depreciation gives $600,000; dividing by the 30-year remaining life instead of the 50-year total life gives $200,000.

Answer Options
A
$200,000
B
$240,000
C
$360,000
D
$600,000

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option C is correct because depreciation is $600,000 × 20 ÷ 50 = $240,000. The depreciated improvement amount is $600,000 − $240,000 = $360,000. No other deductions or salvage value apply.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: $200,000

Option A, $200,000, comes from dividing by the 30-year remaining life instead of the 50-year total life: depreciation of $600,000 × 20 ÷ 30 = $400,000 leaves $200,000. The age-life ratio uses total economic life, giving $600,000 − $240,000 = $360,000.

Option B: $240,000

Option B, $240,000, is the depreciation itself: $600,000 × 20 ÷ 50 = $240,000. The question asks for the depreciated amount, which is $600,000 − $240,000 = $360,000.

Option D: $600,000

Option D, $600,000, stops at cost new before any depreciation. Deducting $600,000 × 20 ÷ 50 = $240,000 gives $360,000.

Effective over total

The age-life ratio is effective age over total economic life. Remaining life belongs in the identity, not the denominator.

How to use: Use this to set up the age-life fraction correctly before multiplying by cost new.

Exam Tip

Check whether the question wants the depreciation or the depreciated amount; both figures usually appear among the choices.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Dividing effective age by remaining life instead of total life
  • -Reporting depreciation instead of the depreciated amount
  • -Using actual age in place of effective age

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

This question tests the straight-line age-life method. Depreciation is cost new times effective age divided by total economic life, and the depreciated amount is cost new minus that depreciation. The key is to divide by total economic life, not remaining life, and to report the remainder.

Background Knowledge

In the age-life method, depreciation is estimated by dividing effective age by total economic life. Total economic life equals effective age plus remaining economic life. Applying the ratio to cost new gives depreciation, and subtracting it gives the depreciated improvement amount.

Real-World Application

An appraiser estimates replacement cost new of a house at $600,000 and concludes an effective age of 20 years and a 50-year economic life from market data. The age-life ratio of 40% produces $240,000 of depreciation and a $360,000 depreciated improvement contribution.

age-life methodeffective agetotal economic lifedepreciated coststraight-line depreciation
Was this explanation helpful?

More Cost Approach Questions

Why can equivalent-utility replacement cost be useful for an obsolete improvement?

An appraiser estimates the current replacement cost new of the improvements at $890,000, accrued depreciation from all causes at $170,000, and land value at $325,000. All necessary cost components and depreciation are included in those amounts. What is the indicated property value?

Improvement cost new is $595,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $48,000, $27,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. Add supported site value of $155,000, already reflecting any site losses. What total indicated value results?

What best supports a claimed loss from a bathroom-layout deficiency?

Improvement cost new is $1,850,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $310,000, $620,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. No site is included. What depreciated improvement amount results?

Which scenario most strongly supports giving the cost approach substantial weight?

A cost total $650,000 explicitly includes $40,000 of non-realty FF&E outside the appraised real-property interest. Exclude it. Supported realty-only total depreciation is $55,000. Add site $200,000, with no overlap. What real-property cost indication results?

A 2,200-sf dwelling costs $200 per square foot, and a separate 400-sf garage costs $75 per square foot. These costs are complete and do not overlap. Both have an effective age of 15 years and a total life of 50 years, with straight-line depreciation and no salvage value. No site value or other loss is involved. What is the combined depreciated cost of the dwelling and garage?

A new feature in the improvements has a current cost of $45,000 and a market contribution of $18,000. The entire difference is due to superadequacy, with no physical or external loss and no overlap. What is the loss from the superadequacy?

An external influence causes an annual net income loss of $9,600. The capitalization rate for the loss is 8%, and no other economic factors change. What is the indicated loss in value of the whole property, before allocation between site and improvements?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing