EstatePass
Cost ApproachMEDIUM13.6% of exam

Current improvement cost new is $800,000. Separately supported, nonoverlapping physical 15% and functional 5% losses are each explicitly measured on that SAME original improvement base. Add site $200,000. What total results?

Correct Answer

B) $840,000

800000×(1−0.15−0.05)+200000=840000. Use the full stated cost buildup and the specified compatible loss base. Common errors: leaving out the site value gives $640,000; leaving out the 5% functional loss gives $880,000; applying the functional loss to the already-reduced base instead of the original base gives $846,000.

Answer Options
A
$640,000
B
$840,000
C
$846,000
D
$880,000

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option B is correct because both losses are measured on the same $800,000 base, so total depreciation is 15% + 5% = 20%. The depreciated improvement is $800,000 x 0.80 = $640,000. Adding the $200,000 site gives $840,000.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: $640,000

Option A, $640,000, is $800,000 x (1 - 0.15 - 0.05), which leaves out the $200,000 site value. The total indication is $640,000 + $200,000 = $840,000.

Option C: $846,000

Option C, $846,000, is $800,000 x 0.85 x 0.95 + $200,000, which applies the functional loss to the already-reduced base instead of the original base. The stem says both losses are measured on the same original base, giving $840,000.

Option D: $880,000

Option D, $880,000, is $800,000 x 0.85 + $200,000, which leaves out the 5% functional loss. Including both losses gives $840,000.

Same base, add percentages

When losses are measured on the same base, add the percentages first and apply them once. Only multiply them in sequence if each is measured on the reduced base.

How to use: Use this rule when a question gives more than one depreciation percentage.

Exam Tip

Read which base each percentage is measured on. Then check whether the question wants a total that includes site value.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Applying the percentages in sequence when both use the original base
  • -Leaving out site value from a total indication
  • -Dropping one of the loss percentages

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

This question tests applying two depreciation percentages that are both measured on the same original cost base. Because both are expressed against the same base and do not overlap, they are added (20%) and applied once. Then the site value is added for the total indication.

Background Knowledge

In the breakdown method, total depreciation is the sum of the individual estimates of physical, functional and external depreciation. When each is measured on the same cost base, the percentages can be added directly. If a later loss is measured on a base already reduced by an earlier one, the calculation is sequential instead, so the stated base matters.

Real-World Application

An appraiser estimates that a dated house has physical deterioration and a functional layout loss, each measured as a percentage of current cost new. The appraiser adds the two percentages, deducts the total from cost new, and adds site value for the cost approach indication.

breakdown methodphysical deteriorationfunctional obsolescencesite valuecost approach
Was this explanation helpful?

More Cost Approach Questions

Which stated cause of supported value loss is external?

Improvement cost new is $450,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $45,000, $25,000, $15,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. Add supported site value of $125,000, already reflecting any site losses. What total indicated value results?

Which two depreciation categories may each be classified as curable or incurable by comparing the cost to remedy a deficiency with the value gained?

Improvement cost new is $800,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $120,000, $80,000, $40,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. No site is included. What depreciated improvement amount results?

The principle of anticipation in real estate valuation states that:

Which highest-and-best-use criterion addresses whether a proposed use is allowed by zoning and applicable legal restrictions?

Three comparables produce adjusted indications of $312,000, $309,000 and $315,000, requiring gross adjustments of 9%, 14% and 22% respectively. Verification also establishes that the first sale is the closest competitive substitute and its adjustments are better supported than the other two. Which indication deserves the most weight on those facts?

When reconciling value indications from the three approaches to value, an appraiser should:

A property sold at a cash-equivalent price of $1,062,500. Its stabilized annual NOI is $85,000. What is the indicated overall rate?

In reconciliation, an appraiser should:

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing