EstatePass
ContractsUtah_repc_structure_and_key_provisionsHARD

A buyer in Draper, Utah has an executed REPC with a Due Diligence Deadline of March 10 and a Financing & Appraisal Deadline of March 25. The buyer's inspector finds a serious foundation issue on March 8. The buyer does NOT cancel before the March 10 Due Diligence Deadline. On March 20, the buyer's lender denies the loan, citing the foundation issue as an unacceptable risk. The buyer sends written notice to the seller on March 21 invoking the Financing & Appraisal condition. Which outcome is most legally accurate under the Utah REPC?

Correct Answer

D) The buyer may successfully invoke the Financing & Appraisal condition and receive a return of earnest money because the lender denied the loan before the March 25 deadline

The Financing & Appraisal condition in the Utah REPC is a separate and independent condition from the Due Diligence condition. Even though the buyer missed the opportunity to cancel under the Due Diligence condition, the buyer can still invoke the Financing & Appraisal condition if the lender actually denies the loan — regardless of the reason for denial. The lender's denial occurred on March 20, and the buyer's written notice was given on March 21, both before the March 25 Financing & Appraisal Deadline. This is a valid invocation of a separate contractual right.

Answer Options
A
The buyer cannot invoke the Financing & Appraisal condition because the foundation issue should have been addressed during the Due Diligence period
B
The buyer and seller must enter mandatory mediation to determine the disposition of earnest money under these circumstances
C
The buyer forfeits the earnest money because the foundation issue was discovered before the Due Diligence Deadline expired and was not acted upon
D
The buyer may successfully invoke the Financing & Appraisal condition and receive a return of earnest money because the lender denied the loan before the March 25 deadline

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

financing_conditiondue_diligenceindependent_conditionsrepcutah_contractsloan_denial

Related Concepts

Specific performance is a court-ordered remedy that compels the breaching party to fulfill their obligations under the contract rather than simply paying monetary damages. It is an equitable remedy used when monetary damages would be inadequate.

The Statute of Frauds is a legal requirement that certain types of contracts must be in writing and signed to be enforceable. In real estate, all contracts for the sale of land or interests in land must be in writing.

A time is of the essence clause in a contract means that all deadlines and dates specified in the agreement are strictly enforceable, and failure to meet them constitutes a material breach.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing