EstatePass
ContractsContract ValidityMEDIUM

A contract where one party uses threats to force the other party to sign is considered:

Correct Answer

B) Voidable due to duress

A contract entered into under duress (threats, coercion, or undue pressure) is voidable at the option of the victim. The threatened party may choose to enforce or rescind the contract.

Answer Options
A
Valid but unenforceable
B
Voidable due to duress
C
Void ab initio
D
Enforceable if consideration exists

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Related Topics:

undue-influencefraudmisrepresentationrescission

Key Terms:

duressvoidablecoercionvictim's choicerescission
Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

People Also Study

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing