EstatePass
ContractsContract ValidityMEDIUM

A contract signed under duress is considered:

Correct Answer

B) Voidable, at the option of the party who was coerced

A contract signed under duress is voidable, not void. This means the party who was coerced or threatened has the option to affirm the contract and proceed, or to rescind it and be relieved of obligations. It is not automatically void, and it is not automatically ratified once the duress ends — the aggrieved party must make an affirmative choice.

Answer Options
A
Void, because it has no legal effect from the beginning
B
Voidable, at the option of the party who was coerced
C
Valid and fully enforceable by all parties
D
Ratified automatically once the duress has ended

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Related Topics:

void-contractsvoidable-contractsundue-influencecontract-rescissionratification

Key Terms:

duressvoidable contractvoid contractrescissionratificationcoercion
Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

People Also Study

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing