EstatePass
ContractsContracts_generalEASY

An “as is” clause in a general purchase contract:

Correct Answer

B) covers only conditions disclosed or plainly visible and observable.

California stopped applying caveat emptor to residential sales decades ago. A seller and the seller's agent must disclose known material defects, and Civil Code §1102.1 makes the Transfer Disclosure Statement duty one the parties cannot waive, so an 'as is' clause cannot reach a known latent defect the buyer was never told about (Lingsch v. Savage (1963) 213 Cal.App.2d 729). What the clause does accomplish is to put the buyer on notice that no repairs will be made, as to conditions that were disclosed or that are visible and observable. That is the full reach of the clause.

Answer Options
A
applies only to matters shown of record in the county recorder's office.
B
covers only conditions disclosed or plainly visible and observable.
C
adopts caveat emptor, so the buyer takes the property with no recourse.
D
invalidates the entire purchase contract as against public policy.
Study Infographics
Study card infographic for: An “as is” clause in a general purchase contract:
Download

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Related Topics:

seller-disclosure-requirementsimplied-warranties-in-real-estatecontract-clauses-and-modificationsrisk-allocation-in-property-transactions

Key Terms:

as is clausecaveat emptorTransfer Disclosure StatementCivil Code 1102material defect disclosure

Related Concepts

Liquidated damages are a predetermined amount of money specified in the contract that the non-breaching party is entitled to receive if the other party breaches. In real estate, the earnest money deposit typically serves as liquidated damages.

Novation is the substitution of a new contract for an existing one, or the replacement of one party with a new party, with the consent of all parties involved. The original party is completely released from all obligations.

Offer and acceptance is the process by which one party proposes specific terms for a contract and the other party agrees to those exact terms, creating mutual assent. This mutual agreement, also called a meeting of the minds, is an essential element of every valid contract.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

A contract where one party uses threats to force the other party to sign is considered:

Kevin and Lisa are purchasing a home in Bellevue. Their purchase and sale agreement includes both a financing contingency and an inspection contingency. The inspection reveals significant foundation issues. Kevin and Lisa request a $15,000 price reduction. The seller counters with a $5,000 reduction. Kevin and Lisa reject the counter and invoke the inspection contingency to terminate the contract. The seller argues the buyers are in breach because they should have used the financing contingency instead. Which statement is most accurate under Washington law?

Kevin and Amy are purchasing a commercial property in Worcester, Massachusetts. Their broker recommends including a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment contingency in the purchase and sale agreement. The seller argues this contingency is only relevant for industrial properties. Under Massachusetts law, why is the broker's recommendation valid for this commercial property?

Sandra agreed to sell her Fairfax County home to David for $575,000. After all contingencies were removed, Sandra received a higher offer and refused to convey the property. David wants to force Sandra to sell him the home at the agreed price. Which remedy should David pursue in Virginia court?

After a property inspection reveals minor cosmetic issues, the buyer demands $20,000 in credits. The seller refuses, and the inspection contingency deadline passes without the buyer formally canceling. What is the likely result?

People Also Study

Related Articles

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing