A purchase agreement for a 25-acre parcel in Ravalli County, Montana is contingent on the buyer obtaining subdivision approval for dividing the land into five 5-acre lots. The seller argues no subdivision review is required because the parcel is over 20 acres. Under the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act, which statement is most accurate?
Correct Answer
A) The 20-acre exemption may not apply if the division creates parcels smaller than 20 acres each
Under the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act (MCA Title 76, Chapter 3), the 20-acre exemption applies when the resulting parcels are each 20 acres or more in size, not simply when the original parcel exceeds 20 acres. Dividing a 25-acre parcel into five 5-acre lots creates parcels well below 20 acres, so the exemption does not apply. Each resulting parcel must meet the 20-acre threshold for the exemption to be valid.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question
Background Knowledge for Contracts
Real World Application in Contracts
Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions
Related Topics & Key Terms
Key Terms:
Related Concepts
A counteroffer is a response to an original offer that changes one or more terms of the offer, effectively rejecting the original offer and creating a new offer. The party who makes the counteroffer becomes the new offeror.
Earnest money is a deposit made by the buyer at the time of the offer or shortly after to demonstrate good faith and serious intent to purchase the property. It is also called a good faith deposit.
Equitable title is the buyer's interest in a property after a purchase contract is signed but before closing, giving the buyer the right to acquire legal title in the future. The seller retains legal title until the deed is delivered at closing.
More Contracts Questions
Which of the following is required for a valid contract in California?
An “as is” clause in a general purchase contract:
A contract formed for an illegal purpose is considered:
After a residential purchase contract has been signed by both parties in Illinois, the buyer and seller verbally agree to change the closing date. What is the legally sound way to document this change?
Specific performance in North Dakota:
- → In a contract for deed (land contract), who retains legal title to the property until the purchase price is fully paid?
- → Which of the following is NOT required for a valid bill of sale?
- → A Nevada real estate salesperson is helping a buyer draft a purchase agreement. Which of the following is NOT a required element for a Nevada residential purchase agreement to be legally enforceable?
- → Sawyer Iverson is reviewing an Illinois issue in Joliet. The person assumes that attorney review automatically replaces every inspection, appraisal, or financing deadline in a standard Illinois residential contract. Which statement best applies?
- → Tom and Linda sign a purchase agreement for a home in Hartford, Connecticut. The agreement includes a financing contingency stating that if Tom cannot obtain a mortgage commitment within 21 days, either party may void the contract. On day 19, Tom's lender issues a written mortgage commitment. On day 22, Tom changes his mind and tries to void the contract by claiming the financing contingency was not satisfied. Which of the following best describes the legal status of the contract?
- → Avery Jenkins is reviewing an Illinois issue in Normal. The person asks what happens if neither attorney sends a disapproval or proposed change during the standard review period. Which statement best applies?
- → Under Montana law, a purchase agreement for residential real property becomes legally binding on the seller when which of the following occurs?
- → Johnny wants the seller's patio furniture included in his purchase of a house. Before the offer is signed and delivered to the seller, he asks his agent to attach a page covering the furniture to the offer. That attached page is best described as:
- → A bilateral contract in real estate is best described as:
- → A contract where one party uses threats to force the other party to sign is considered:
People Also Study
Buyer Representation Agreement
8% of exam
Property Ownership
10% of exam
Land Use Controls and Regulations
8% of exam
Valuation and Market Analysis
10% of exam
Related Articles
Real Estate Exam Practice Questions by Topic (2026): Free Sets for Contracts, Agency, Financing
Get topic-based real estate exam practice sets and a simple sequence to move from learning to timed mocks.
Real Estate Exam Topics (2026): High-Yield Areas + Common Traps (Contracts, Agency, Financing, Fair Housing)
Learn the highest-frequency real estate exam topics and the traps that cause most wrong answers—plus how to study them.
Real Estate Exam Contracts: The Only Guide You Need (2026) + Practice Questions
Learn the contract rules the exam loves, common trick wording, and how to practice contract questions efficiently.
