EstatePass
ContractsBreach_and_remediesHARD

Broker David holds earnest money of $15,000 in his trust account for a transaction involving seller Maria and buyer Chen. The purchase agreement fell through, and both parties signed a mutual cancellation agreement but disagreed on who should receive the earnest money — the agreement was silent on earnest money disposition upon cancellation. Chen demands the full $15,000 back. Maria demands $5,000 as compensation for her carrying costs. David's supervising broker advises him to release $10,000 to Chen and $5,000 to Maria based on the broker's own assessment of fairness. Under Minn. Stat. Ch. 82 and MN DOC rules, which action should David take?

Correct Answer

C) Retain all $15,000 in the trust account and require a written agreement signed by both parties specifying the disposition, or interplead the funds with a court if no agreement is reached

Under Minn. Stat. Ch. 82 and MN DOC trust account rules, a broker may not disburse disputed earnest money based on the broker's or supervising broker's personal assessment of a fair split. When a mutual cancellation agreement is silent on earnest money disposition and the parties disagree, the broker must retain the funds in the trust account until either (1) both parties provide written instructions agreeing on the disposition, or (2) the dispute is resolved through litigation (interpleader or court order). The supervising broker's opinion does not constitute legal authority to disburse.

Answer Options
A
Follow the supervising broker's instructions and split the funds $10,000 to Chen and $5,000 to Maria, as the supervising broker has authority over trust account disbursements
B
Release the full $15,000 to Chen because the mutual cancellation agreement terminated the contract and Chen is presumed entitled to a full refund absent a specific forfeiture clause
C
Retain all $15,000 in the trust account and require a written agreement signed by both parties specifying the disposition, or interplead the funds with a court if no agreement is reached
D
Release the full $15,000 to Maria because she is the seller and the listing agreement gives the seller priority over earnest money upon cancellation

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

trust_accountearnest_money_disputemutual_cancellationbroker_dutiesinterpleader

Related Concepts

The Statute of Frauds is a legal requirement that certain types of contracts must be in writing and signed to be enforceable. In real estate, all contracts for the sale of land or interests in land must be in writing.

A time is of the essence clause in a contract means that all deadlines and dates specified in the agreement are strictly enforceable, and failure to meet them constitutes a material breach.

An appraisal contingency allows the buyer to cancel or renegotiate the contract if the property's appraised value comes in lower than the agreed-upon purchase price. This contingency protects buyers from overpaying.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing