EstatePass
ContractsContingenciesHARD

David is purchasing a home in Edina under a purchase agreement that contains a financing contingency but no inspection contingency. After the financing contingency deadline passes without cancellation, David's inspector discovers significant foundation damage. David wants to cancel the contract. The seller refuses and threatens to retain the earnest money. Which statement most accurately describes David's legal position under Minnesota law?

Correct Answer

C) David has limited options because he did not include an inspection contingency, and the financing contingency has been waived; he may be liable for earnest money if he does not close

David's situation illustrates the critical importance of including an inspection contingency. Because no inspection contingency was included in the purchase agreement and the financing contingency deadline has passed without cancellation, David has no clear contractual right to cancel based on the inspection findings alone. Without a valid contingency to invoke, David risks being in default if he refuses to close. His only potential avenue would be to prove fraud or intentional concealment by the seller under the Minnesota Residential Property Disclosure Act (Minn. Stat. § 513.52), which is a much higher legal bar than simply exercising a contingency.

Answer Options
A
David may cancel without penalty because foundation damage is always considered a material latent defect under Minnesota disclosure law
B
David may cancel under the seller's disclosure obligations since the seller was required to disclose the foundation damage under Minn. Stat. § 513.52
C
David has limited options because he did not include an inspection contingency, and the financing contingency has been waived; he may be liable for earnest money if he does not close
D
David may cancel because Minnesota law requires all purchase agreements to include an inspection contingency for residential properties

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

inspection_contingencymissing_contingencyfoundation_damagedefault_riskdisclosure_actearnest_money_forfeiture

Related Concepts

An appraisal contingency allows the buyer to cancel or renegotiate the contract if the property's appraised value comes in lower than the agreed-upon purchase price. This contingency protects buyers from overpaying.

An assignment of contract transfers one party's rights and obligations under a contract to a third party called the assignee. The original party, known as the assignor, transfers their contractual position to someone who was not originally part of the agreement.

A bilateral contract is an agreement in which both parties exchange promises and are both obligated to perform, while a unilateral contract is one in which only one party makes a promise and the other party is not obligated to act.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing