EstatePass
ContractsContingenciesHARD

Sandra receives the Seller's Disclosure Statement for a Flint home two days after signing the purchase agreement. The disclosure reveals the home has a history of lead pipe issues. Sandra wants to rescind. She provides oral notice to her agent within 72 hours of receiving the disclosure. The seller argues the rescission is invalid. Who is most likely correct under the Michigan Seller Disclosure Act?

Correct Answer

A) The seller is correct because rescission under the Michigan Seller Disclosure Act must be in writing

Under the Michigan Seller Disclosure Act (MCL 565.957), a buyer who wishes to rescind a purchase agreement after receiving the Seller's Disclosure Statement must provide written notice of rescission within 72 hours. Oral notice does not satisfy the statutory requirement. Even though Sandra communicated her intent within the time window, the failure to provide written notice means the rescission is not valid under the Act, and the seller's objection is well-founded.

Answer Options
A
The seller is correct because rescission under the Michigan Seller Disclosure Act must be in writing
B
The seller is correct because lead pipe issues are a known condition in older homes and are not material
C
Sandra is correct because she communicated her intent to rescind within the 72-hour window
D
Sandra is correct because oral notice to her agent constitutes constructive notice to the seller

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

seller_disclosure_actrescissionwritten_notice72_hourslead_pipesflint

Related Concepts

Specific performance is a court-ordered remedy that compels the breaching party to fulfill their obligations under the contract rather than simply paying monetary damages. It is an equitable remedy used when monetary damages would be inadequate.

The Statute of Frauds is a legal requirement that certain types of contracts must be in writing and signed to be enforceable. In real estate, all contracts for the sale of land or interests in land must be in writing.

A time is of the essence clause in a contract means that all deadlines and dates specified in the agreement are strictly enforceable, and failure to meet them constitutes a material breach.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing