EstatePass
ContractsPurchase_agreementsMEDIUM

Priya makes an offer to purchase a home in Kailua-Kona for $850,000. The seller counters at $875,000. Priya then counters back at $860,000. Before the seller can respond to Priya's counter, the seller calls Priya's agent and verbally accepts the original offer of $850,000. Which of the following best describes the legal status of this transaction?

Correct Answer

C) No binding contract exists because Priya's counter-offer at $860,000 terminated the seller's counter at $875,000

Under contract law as applied in Hawaii, a counter-offer operates as a rejection of the prior offer and substitutes a new offer. When Priya counter-offered at $860,000, she rejected the seller's counter at $875,000. The seller's original counter at $875,000 is no longer available for acceptance. The seller's verbal acceptance of the original $850,000 offer is ineffective because that offer was extinguished by the chain of counter-offers. No binding contract exists at this point.

Answer Options
A
A binding contract exists at $850,000 because the seller verbally accepted the original offer
B
A binding contract exists at $875,000 because the seller's counter was the last written offer
C
No binding contract exists because Priya's counter-offer at $860,000 terminated the seller's counter at $875,000
D
A binding contract exists at $860,000 because Priya's counter is deemed accepted by the seller's verbal response

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

counter_offercontract_formationoffer_and_acceptancepurchase_agreementmutual_assent

Related Concepts

An appraisal contingency allows the buyer to cancel or renegotiate the contract if the property's appraised value comes in lower than the agreed-upon purchase price. This contingency protects buyers from overpaying.

An assignment of contract transfers one party's rights and obligations under a contract to a third party called the assignee. The original party, known as the assignor, transfers their contractual position to someone who was not originally part of the agreement.

A bilateral contract is an agreement in which both parties exchange promises and are both obligated to perform, while a unilateral contract is one in which only one party makes a promise and the other party is not obligated to act.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Contracts Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing