EstatePass
AgencyDual_agencyHARD

Broker Sophia is a broker associate at Alpine Group Realty. She has been representing buyer Kim under a signed buyer agency agreement. Kim wants to purchase a property listed by Sophia's employing broker, who also personally holds the listing. Alpine Group's employing broker proposes to act as the dual agent for both Kim and the seller, with Sophia continuing to assist Kim under the employing broker's supervision. Both parties are asked to sign dual agency consent forms. Which of the following most accurately identifies a potential problem with this arrangement under Colorado law?

Correct Answer

B) The employing broker acting as dual agent while also personally holding the listing creates an inherent conflict that requires careful disclosure and consent beyond standard dual agency forms

When an employing broker personally holds the listing and simultaneously acts as the dual agent for the buyer, the conflict of interest is heightened beyond a standard in-house dual agency situation. Under Colorado's brokerage relationship statutes (C.R.S. § 12-10-401 et seq.) and CREC's rules, the employing broker's personal involvement on both sides of the transaction requires particularly robust disclosure to both parties so they can make a truly informed decision about consenting to the arrangement. The standard dual agency consent form may not fully capture the specific nature of this conflict, and both parties must understand that the same individual is simultaneously the listing broker and the buyer's representative.

Answer Options
A
The arrangement is improper because Sophia, not the employing broker, must be the dual agent
B
The employing broker acting as dual agent while also personally holding the listing creates an inherent conflict that requires careful disclosure and consent beyond standard dual agency forms
C
The arrangement is fully proper because the employing broker has authority to act as dual agent in all in-house transactions without additional requirements
D
The arrangement is improper because designated agency is mandatory whenever the employing broker personally holds the listing

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Agency Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Agency

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Agency

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Agency Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

dual_agencyemploying_brokerconflict_of_interestdisclosureexpert_trapcolorado_brokerage_relationships

Related Concepts

The legal principle that holds a broker responsible for the actions of their agents and employees performed within the scope of the agency relationship.

An agency relationship created when a principal's actions or words lead a third party to reasonably believe that an agent has authority, and the principal fails to correct this belief.

An agency relationship created when a principal approves or accepts an agent's previously unauthorized actions, effectively granting authority after the fact.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Agency Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Agency Questions

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing