Why can a market-supported entrepreneurial incentive belong in full improvement cost?
Correct Answer
C) It is the market-expected reward for the developer’s risk and effort.
A supported expected development reward compensates entrepreneurial effort and risk and may enter full economic cost when not already included. It differs from contractor profit and construction interest. Actual projects can lose money or be built for other motives, so every project does not automatically justify a fixed positive incentive.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option C is correct because entrepreneurial incentive is the market-expected reward for the developer's risk and effort. Full economic cost includes market-supportable entrepreneurial profit along with direct and indirect costs. A developer would expect this return before undertaking a project.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: It is the appraiser’s own fee, treated as the profit earned on the assignment.
Option A is wrong because the appraiser's own fee for the assignment has nothing to do with the cost of building the improvements. Entrepreneurial incentive is the developer's reward, not the appraiser's profit.
Option B: It is identical to the lender’s construction loan interest.
Option B is wrong because entrepreneurial incentive is not identical to the lender's construction loan interest. Construction interest is an indirect cost, while incentive is the developer's separate return for risk and expertise.
Option D: It offsets the depreciation deducted in the cost approach.
Option D is wrong because entrepreneurial incentive does not offset depreciation. It is part of cost new, and depreciation is a separate deduction for loss in value.
Developer's reward for risk
Entrepreneurial incentive is the developer's paycheck for taking the risk, separate from the contractor's markup and the lender's interest.
How to use: Use this when a question asks what entrepreneurial incentive represents.
Exam Tip
Look for the answer tied to the developer's risk and effort; contractor profit and loan interest are separate cost items.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Confusing entrepreneurial incentive with contractor profit
- -Treating construction loan interest as entrepreneurial incentive
- -Assuming every project justifies a fixed positive incentive
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests what entrepreneurial incentive is and why it belongs in full cost. It is the market-expected return to the developer for development expertise and risk-taking. It is separate from contractor profit and construction interest, and it is included when market supported and not already counted.
Background Knowledge
Entrepreneurial profit is the return to the entrepreneur for development expertise and risk-taking, distinct from the contractor's overhead and profit, which is a direct cost. Full economic cost includes market-supportable entrepreneurial profit plus all direct and indirect costs.
Real-World Application
Interviews with local developers show they expect a return of a certain share of total cost before starting new subdivisions. The appraiser includes a market-supported incentive in cost new for a newly built home.
More Cost Approach Questions
Why can equivalent-utility replacement cost be useful for an obsolete improvement?
An appraiser estimates the current replacement cost new of the improvements at $890,000, accrued depreciation from all causes at $170,000, and land value at $325,000. All necessary cost components and depreciation are included in those amounts. What is the indicated property value?
Improvement cost new is $595,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $48,000, $27,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. Add supported site value of $155,000, already reflecting any site losses. What total indicated value results?
What best supports a claimed loss from a bathroom-layout deficiency?
Improvement cost new is $1,850,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $310,000, $620,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. No site is included. What depreciated improvement amount results?
Which scenario most strongly supports giving the cost approach substantial weight?
A cost total $650,000 explicitly includes $40,000 of non-realty FF&E outside the appraised real-property interest. Exclude it. Supported realty-only total depreciation is $55,000. Add site $200,000, with no overlap. What real-property cost indication results?
A 2,200-sf dwelling costs $200 per square foot, and a separate 400-sf garage costs $75 per square foot. These costs are complete and do not overlap. Both have an effective age of 15 years and a total life of 50 years, with straight-line depreciation and no salvage value. No site value or other loss is involved. What is the combined depreciated cost of the dwelling and garage?
A new feature in the improvements has a current cost of $45,000 and a market contribution of $18,000. The entire difference is due to superadequacy, with no physical or external loss and no overlap. What is the loss from the superadequacy?
An external influence causes an annual net income loss of $9,600. The capitalization rate for the loss is 8%, and no other economic factors change. What is the indicated loss in value of the whole property, before allocation between site and improvements?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam