Which verified fact best supports investigating an effective age below a dwelling’s 50-year actual age?
Correct Answer
D) Successful major renovations, now in good current condition
Effective age reflects observed condition and utility relative to competing properties; actual age is elapsed time since construction. Verified successful renovations can support an effective age below actual age. Evaluate workmanship, remaining condition and market relevance rather than subtracting years mechanically.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because successful major renovations in good current condition improve the property's condition and utility. A well-maintained or renovated property generally has an effective age somewhat lower than its actual age. The appraiser still evaluates the quality and market relevance of the work rather than subtracting years mechanically.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: The original windows, because they are still original
Option A is wrong because original windows that are still original show no updating. Original components do not support a younger effective age.
Option B: A deteriorated original roof that is still in place today
Option B is wrong because a deteriorated original roof still in place indicates wear rather than updating. It gives no support for an effective age below the 50-year actual age.
Option C: Old wiring, because of how old the wiring is
Option C is wrong because old wiring, cited just for its age, shows no improvement in condition. It does not support an effective age below the 50-year actual age.
Renovate to look younger
Effective age is how old the house acts; good updates make it act younger than its birth year.
How to use: Use this to choose which facts can lower effective age below actual age.
Exam Tip
Facts showing updated, well-kept components support a lower effective age; original or deteriorated items do not.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Treating effective age as the same as actual age
- -Citing original or worn components as reasons for a lower effective age
- -Subtracting years mechanically for each renovation
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the difference between actual age and effective age. Effective age reflects observed condition and utility compared with competing properties, so improvements that refresh the property can support an effective age below actual age. Original, aging or deteriorated components point the other way.
Background Knowledge
Actual age is the time since construction, while effective age reflects the property's condition and utility relative to competing properties. Renovation and good maintenance can make effective age lower than actual age. Poor maintenance can make it higher.
Real-World Application
An appraiser inspects a 50-year-old house that received a well-executed renovation of its kitchen, baths and mechanical systems. Compared with competing homes, it shows condition similar to much newer houses, so the appraiser estimates an effective age below actual age.
More Property Description Questions
A local zoning ordinance allows these maximum densities: R-1, 4 units per acre; R-2, 8 units per acre; R-4, 20 units per acre; PUD (with approval), 12 units per acre. Which category allows the highest density?
What design advantage is commonly associated with post-and-beam construction?
A hypothetical local ordinance permits either a single-family house or duplex on the site. The existing single-family house complies with all current rules. Which statement is supported?
A zoning variance allowing a reduced side setback is granted for a parcel. After the parcel is sold, who generally holds the benefit of the variance, subject to its conditions?
Under ANSI Z765-2021 as applied by Fannie Mae, a staircase runs from the second floor down to the first floor. Its area is counted as part of:
Under ANSI Z765-2021, as Fannie Mae requires for a detached house, where are exterior dimensions taken on a brick-veneer wall?
A building's HVAC system would be classified as which type of building component?
A home on a large tract is valued at $620,000 including the land it needs. The remaining excess land could be sold separately and contributes a net $95,000 after separation costs. What is the total indicated value?
A covered sale concerns a residence built in 1965. Which hazard is the subject of the federal pre 1978 housing disclosure rule, without assuming its actual presence?
Which site characteristic is most likely to reduce site utility by restricting where a typical dwelling can be placed?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
An appraiser discovers that a property is subject to a conservation easement that prohibits any future development of the rear 2 acres. This easement would most directly affect:
Next Question
On a five-acre development site, a confirmed applicable restriction prohibits development or filling of the 30% delineated as wetlands. What is the direct development constraint?
