When reconciling value indications, which factor is LEAST important?
Correct Answer
D) The mathematical average of the three approaches
An arithmetic mean can describe a set of indications, but it does not by itself evaluate their applicability or reliability. Those evidentiary considerations and the sources behind them are central to reconciliation. This does not prohibit a properly explained, supported weighted calculation.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because the final value estimate is not a simple average of the indicators; one or two approaches often deserve greater weight. An arithmetic mean does not assess applicability or reliability. A supported, explained weighted calculation is still acceptable, but a plain average is not a reconciliation factor in itself.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Appropriateness of each approach for the property type
Option A, appropriateness of each approach for the property type, is a central reconciliation factor. It determines which approach best measures the property's benefits, so it is highly important rather than least important.
Option B: Quantity and quality of data available
Option B, quantity and quality of data available, directly affects each approach's reliability. It is a key factor in assigning weight, not the least important one.
Option C: Reliability of the sources of the data
Option C, reliability of the sources of the data, determines how much confidence an indication deserves. It is an important consideration, not the least important.
Average describes, analysis decides
An average only summarizes the numbers; appropriateness and data quality decide the weights.
How to use: Use this on 'least important' reconciliation factor questions.
Exam Tip
On 'LEAST' questions, the three evidence-quality factors are the important ones; the arithmetic shortcut is the answer.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Treating the average of indications as a key reconciliation factor
- -Overlooking the reliability of data sources
- -Assuming any weighted calculation is prohibited
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question asks which factor is least important in reconciling indications. Appropriateness, data quantity and quality, and source reliability are core considerations. A mathematical average describes the numbers but does not evaluate them, so it matters least.
Background Knowledge
Reconciliation weighs approaches by their appropriateness and the quality and reliability of their data. One or two approaches often carry more weight than the others. Averaging can describe a set of numbers but does not replace this evaluation.
Real-World Application
A trainee proposes averaging three approaches for a home. The supervising appraiser points out that the cost approach relies on uncertain depreciation and the sales data are strong. They weight sales comparison most and explain why.
More Reconciliation Questions
Which stated cause of supported value loss is external?
Improvement cost new is $450,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $45,000, $25,000, $15,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. Add supported site value of $125,000, already reflecting any site losses. What total indicated value results?
Which two depreciation categories may each be classified as curable or incurable by comparing the cost to remedy a deficiency with the value gained?
Improvement cost new is $800,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $120,000, $80,000, $40,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. No site is included. What depreciated improvement amount results?
The principle of anticipation in real estate valuation states that:
Which highest-and-best-use criterion addresses whether a proposed use is allowed by zoning and applicable legal restrictions?
Three comparables produce adjusted indications of $312,000, $309,000 and $315,000, requiring gross adjustments of 9%, 14% and 22% respectively. Verification also establishes that the first sale is the closest competitive substitute and its adjustments are better supported than the other two. Which indication deserves the most weight on those facts?
When reconciling value indications from the three approaches to value, an appraiser should:
A property sold at a cash-equivalent price of $1,062,500. Its stabilized annual NOI is $85,000. What is the indicated overall rate?
In reconciliation, an appraiser should:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Related Tools
Previous Question
A cash price of $500,000 occurred 18 months before the effective date. Apply a supported simple 1.5% annual increase on original price, prorated by months. Then add a supported +$25,000 location difference in effective-date dollars. What adjusted price results?
Next Question
A cash-equivalent resale pair with all other relevant factors controlled moves from $280,000 to $294,000 in exactly 12 months. What annual percentage increase on the original price does this pair indicate?