What must the certification state about the appraiser's compensation?
Correct Answer
D) That it was not contingent on the outcome
The certification addresses prohibited compensation contingencies, including a predetermined result, direction favoring the client’s cause, amount of the value opinion, attainment of a stipulated result, and a subsequent event directly related to the appraiser’s opinions and specific to the assignment’s purpose. It does not universally require the ordinary assignment fee amount or proof the invoice was paid. Do not broaden the subsequent-event clause into a prohibition on every unrelated later event.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because the certification states that the appraiser's compensation is not contingent on the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value favoring the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use. This protects appraiser independence. It does not require disclosing the fee amount or payment status.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: The exact amount the appraiser was paid
Option A says the certification must state the exact amount the appraiser was paid. The certification addresses prohibited compensation contingencies, not the fee amount.
Option B: That the fee was customary and reasonable
Option B says the certification must state that the fee was customary and reasonable. That standard comes from lending regulation, not from the USPAP certification wording on compensation.
Option C: That the client has paid the invoice in full
Option C says the certification must state that the client paid the invoice in full. Payment status is not part of the certification's compensation statement.
Pay Is Not Tied to Value
The certification promises the fee does not depend on the number or the outcome.
How to use: Use this to pick the contingency statement in compensation certification questions.
Exam Tip
Do not confuse USPAP certification wording with lending regulation concepts such as customary and reasonable fees.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Thinking the fee amount must appear in the certification
- -Confusing the certification with the Regulation Z customary-and-reasonable standard
- -Broadening the subsequent-event clause to every unrelated later event
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests what the Standard 2 certification states about compensation. The certification addresses prohibited contingencies rather than fee amounts or payment status. You need to identify the contingency statement among options that describe other fee details.
Background Knowledge
The real property appraisal certification includes statements about the appraiser's impartiality and compensation. The compensation statement confirms that pay does not depend on reaching a particular value, favoring the client, hitting a stipulated result, or a subsequent event directly related to the intended use. This supports independent, unbiased opinions.
Real-World Application
A client offers an appraiser a bonus if the value comes in high enough to support a refinance. The appraiser declines, since accepting would make the certification's compensation statement false. She completes the assignment for her ordinary fee.
More USPAP Questions
In a cost approach for an improved property, an appraiser estimates site value by sales comparison, allocation and extraction, then settles on one site-value figure before final reconciliation. How is this step best described?
An extraordinary assumption was reasonably supported, properly used and disclosed in an appraisal report. Later, the assumed information is found to be false. Which conclusion is best supported?
An otherwise applicable valuation approach cannot be developed reliably from the available data. The remaining scope can produce credible assignment results. What should the appraiser do?
May an appraiser use a hypothetical condition in any assignment?
An appraisal has a current effective date and permits an extraordinary assumption if its requirements are met. Which situation involves uncertain information rather than a fact known to be contrary to reality on that date?
Why must a report identify any real property interest that is being excluded from the value opinion?
Which review best helps explain divergent cost, sales-comparison and income indications?
Two value indications are $340,000 and $392,000. What is the difference as a percentage of the lower indication, rounded to one decimal place?
An unauthorized third party requests a lender-client’s report. No due-process or other permitted disclosure exception applies. How should the appraiser respond?
An appraiser proposes to assume there are no hidden defects. Which fact would characterize that assumption as extraordinary under the USPAP 2024 definition, rather than justify dismissing it as routine boilerplate?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Previous Question
Two value indications are $296,000 and $334,000. What is the difference as a percentage of the lower indication, rounded to one decimal place?
Next Question
In Assignment A, three well-supported indications fall within 1.5% of each other and the reconciled figure is $487,350. In Assignment B, the data are thin, the indications spread 15% apart, and the reconciled figure is $512,740. Which rounding treatment is best supported?