EstatePass
Land/SiteHARD4.5% of exam

What is the appraiser's obligation when a site's legal description does not match its apparent physical boundaries?

Correct Answer

C) Investigate and establish the property appraised, documenting the basis and limitations

Investigate the discrepancy using reliable title, survey or other appropriate information, and identify the property actually appraised and any material limitations. Disclosure alone does not resolve an uncertain property identity. Do not choose a convenient boundary or assume an unsupported legal conclusion.

Answer Options
A
Use whichever boundary yields the highest value
B
Ignore the legal description whenever a fence exists
C
Investigate and establish the property appraised, documenting the basis and limitations
D
Reduce the value by the apparent area difference, without investigating the boundary

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option C is correct because USPAP requires the report to contain information sufficient to identify the real estate, including its physical and legal characteristics. The appraiser should investigate the discrepancy using title, survey or other appropriate information, establish the property actually appraised, and document the basis and any material limitations.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: Use whichever boundary yields the highest value

Option A, using whichever boundary yields the highest value, is advocacy rather than objective property identification. The property appraised must be determined by evidence, not by its effect on value.

Option B: Ignore the legal description whenever a fence exists

Option B, ignoring the legal description whenever a fence exists, assumes a legal conclusion that a fence does not establish. A fence may or may not match the legal boundary, so the discrepancy must be investigated.

Option D: Reduce the value by the apparent area difference, without investigating the boundary

Option D, reducing value by the apparent area difference without investigating, skips the required identification step. The appraiser first needs to establish what property is being appraised before any value effect can be supported.

Identify before you value

You cannot value a property until you know exactly which property it is, so boundary conflicts get investigated first.

How to use: Use this when a question describes a mismatch between records and what is seen on site.

Exam Tip

Prefer answers that call for investigation, identification and disclosure over answers that pick a boundary or adjust value without support.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Treating a fence line as the legal boundary
  • -Selecting the boundary that produces the higher value
  • -Disclosing the discrepancy without resolving which property is appraised

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

This question tests the appraiser's duty to identify the real estate being appraised. When the legal description and physical boundaries disagree, the appraiser must investigate with reliable information and clearly state what property was appraised and any limitations. Choosing a convenient boundary or making an unsupported adjustment does not meet that duty.

Background Knowledge

Identifying the subject property, including its legal and physical characteristics and the interest appraised, is a basic part of scope of work. Boundary questions may require surveys, title records or extraordinary assumptions, and a material uncertainty must be disclosed.

Real-World Application

During an inspection, an appraiser notices that a fence encloses a strip the plat map shows as part of the neighboring lot. The appraiser reviews the survey and title information, identifies the property appraised as the legally described parcel, and notes the encroachment and its possible effect in the report.

legal descriptionproperty identificationboundary discrepancysurveyUSPAP
Was this explanation helpful?

More Land/Site Questions

How should an appraiser account for a site's access to public sewer compared with competing sites that require septic systems?

Which fact, if supported by competitive-market evidence, most directly supports a unit-price premium for an otherwise comparable site?

A rectangular site's frontage is doubled while its depth is halved, keeping area constant. What is the likely value effect in a retail district?

A downtown site's zoning height limit is reduced from six stories to three. Buyers in this market had been paying for six-story development potential. What effect on land value is most supportable?

A zoning change increases permitted density from four to eight units per acre. What is the likely effect on site value?

Using the allocation method, market evidence supports a typical land-to-total-property-value ratio of 28% for similar improved properties in the subject’s location. An improved comparable sold for $825,000. What land (site) contribution is indicated by applying that ratio?

An appraiser is valuing a vacant site near a landfill. A similar vacant site that is not affected by the landfill sold for $480,000. Paired land sales indicate that proximity to the landfill lowers site prices by $70,000. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated value of the subject site?

An appraiser is extracting site value from a $600,000 cash sale. The seller's records show an original construction cost of $250,000 and a depreciated book value of $110,000. The appraiser estimates current replacement cost new at $400,000 and accrued depreciation from all causes at $100,000. What is the indicated site value?

Three parcels assembled under single ownership (standard appraisal guidance assemblage) support separate as-is values of $290,000, $340,000, and $250,000. After assemblage for a higher-utility use, the combined site is valued at $1,050,000. Assemblage costs (demolition, legal, holding, and related) total $55,000. What is the indicated net plottage (plottage increment after assemblage costs)?

A comparable commercial site with 65 front feet sold for a cash-equivalent price of $585,000. Per standard appraisal guidance, sale price per front foot is a vacant-land unit of comparison when frontage is a primary value determinant. The subject site has 72 front feet and is otherwise similar. What indicated land value does the front-foot unit support before other adjustments?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing