Under Fannie Mae's Selling Guide, an appraiser's sales comparison approach indicates $410,000 and the cost approach indicates $432,000. Believing that neither approach fully reflects recent upgrades, the appraiser wants to report a final value of $440,000. What does the Selling Guide require?
Correct Answer
C) The final value must fall within the $410,000 to $432,000 range.
Under Fannie Mae's Selling Guide, the final reconciled value must be within the range of the values indicated by the approaches used. If the upgrades matter, they belong in the approaches themselves, which would then change the indicated range. An addendum explanation or an upgrade allowance does not permit a value outside the range, and nothing requires the value to equal the sales comparison indication.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option C is correct because the Selling Guide requires the final reconciled value to fall within the range of the values indicated by the approaches used, here $410,000 to $432,000. If the upgrades add value, the appraiser should reflect them in the approaches, which would then support a different range.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: The $440,000 may be reported if the upgrades are explained in an addendum.
Option A allows the $440,000 if the upgrades are explained in an addendum. An addendum can supply supporting detail, but it does not override the requirement that the final value fall within the range of the indications.
Option B: The final value may exceed the range by up to the cost of the upgrades.
Option B lets the value exceed the range by up to the cost of the upgrades. The Guide sets no such allowance, and cost is not a measure of the upgrades' contribution to market value.
Option D: The final value must equal the sales comparison indication of $410,000.
Option D requires the value to equal the $410,000 sales comparison indication. The Guide requires a value within the range, not one that matches a particular approach.
Stay inside the fence
The approaches you developed build the fence; under Fannie Mae, the final value stays inside it. If something is missing, move the fence by fixing the approaches.
How to use: Use this when a Fannie Mae question proposes a final value above or below every approach indication.
Exam Tip
For Fannie Mae reconciliation questions, check whether the proposed final value lies within the range of the approach indications.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Reporting a final value outside the range of the approach indications
- -Treating an addendum explanation as permission to exceed the range
- -Adding the cost of upgrades on top of the reconciled value
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests a specific Fannie Mae program rule on reconciliation. The final value has to be supported by the approaches the appraiser actually developed, so it must fall within their range. A factor the appraiser believes is missing must be built into the approaches rather than added on top of them.
Background Knowledge
Fannie Mae's Selling Guide requires the appraiser to consider the reliability and applicability of each approach used, explain the reconciliation, and report a final value within the range of the indicated values. This is a program rule for loans sold to Fannie Mae. A value outside the range signals that something was left out of the approaches.
Real-World Application
A home has a newly renovated kitchen that the appraiser thinks the comparables do not capture. Instead of reporting a value above both indications, the appraiser finds sales with similar renovations, supports an adjustment, and reconciles within the revised range.
More Reconciliation Questions
In a cost approach for an improved property, an appraiser estimates site value by sales comparison, allocation and extraction, then settles on one site-value figure before final reconciliation. How is this step best described?
An extraordinary assumption was reasonably supported, properly used and disclosed in an appraisal report. Later, the assumed information is found to be false. Which conclusion is best supported?
An otherwise applicable valuation approach cannot be developed reliably from the available data. The remaining scope can produce credible assignment results. What should the appraiser do?
May an appraiser use a hypothetical condition in any assignment?
An appraisal has a current effective date and permits an extraordinary assumption if its requirements are met. Which situation involves uncertain information rather than a fact known to be contrary to reality on that date?
Why must a report identify any real property interest that is being excluded from the value opinion?
Which review best helps explain divergent cost, sales-comparison and income indications?
Two value indications are $340,000 and $392,000. What is the difference as a percentage of the lower indication, rounded to one decimal place?
An unauthorized third party requests a lender-client’s report. No due-process or other permitted disclosure exception applies. How should the appraiser respond?
An appraiser proposes to assume there are no hidden defects. Which fact would characterize that assumption as extraordinary under the USPAP 2024 definition, rather than justify dismissing it as routine boilerplate?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Previous Question
Assume an extraordinary assumption satisfies the applicable development requirements and is used in a written real-property appraisal. What reporting treatment is required?
Next Question
What does it mean that a value opinion must be reasonable rather than merely arithmetically derived?