The principle of contribution states that:
Correct Answer
D) A component’s value is what it adds to the overall property value
Under the principle of contribution, a component’s value is measured by what it adds to (or, by its absence, takes from) the value of the whole property in its market. That contribution can be more or less than its cost and can differ from one property or market to another. Conformity is a separate principle.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because the principle of contribution measures a component's value by what it adds to the value of the whole property, or what its absence takes away. For example, a pool that market data show adds $10,000 has a value of $10,000 even if it cost $25,000 to build. That contribution depends on the market rather than on cost.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: A component’s value equals its cost to build or install
Option A says a component's value equals its cost to build or install. Under contribution, value is what the market pays for the component, which can be more or less than its cost, as the $10,000 pool that cost $25,000 shows.
Option B: Each improvement adds the same amount wherever it is located
Option B says each improvement adds the same amount wherever it is located. Contribution depends on the market, so the same improvement can add different amounts in different neighborhoods or property types.
Option C: Properties must follow a required neighborhood design rule
Option C describes a required neighborhood design rule, which relates to conformity or to private or public land-use controls, not to the principle of contribution.
Value added, not money spent
Ask what the buyer pays extra for the feature, not what the owner paid to install it. The $25,000 pool worth $10,000 is the classic picture.
How to use: Use this when an answer equates a feature's cost with its value.
Exam Tip
Answers that tie value to cost or claim a feature has a fixed value everywhere describe something other than contribution.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Adjusting for a feature at its construction cost
- -Assuming a feature adds the same value in every market
- -Confusing contribution with conformity
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the definition of the principle of contribution. The key idea is that a component is worth what it adds to the value of the whole property, not what it cost. Separate this from conformity, which deals with how well a property fits its surroundings.
Background Knowledge
The principle of contribution underlies line-item adjustments in the sales comparison approach. Each feature is adjusted for its market contribution, which is often found through paired sales or other market analysis. Cost may be a reference point, but it does not by itself establish market value.
Real-World Application
An owner spent heavily on a high-end kitchen in a modest neighborhood. Paired sales show buyers in that market pay only part of that cost, so the appraiser adjusts for the kitchen's market contribution rather than its cost.
More Sales Comparison Questions
Which stated cause of supported value loss is external?
Improvement cost new is $450,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $45,000, $25,000, $15,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. Add supported site value of $125,000, already reflecting any site losses. What total indicated value results?
Which two depreciation categories may each be classified as curable or incurable by comparing the cost to remedy a deficiency with the value gained?
Improvement cost new is $800,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $120,000, $80,000, $40,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. No site is included. What depreciated improvement amount results?
The principle of anticipation in real estate valuation states that:
Which highest-and-best-use criterion addresses whether a proposed use is allowed by zoning and applicable legal restrictions?
Three comparables produce adjusted indications of $312,000, $309,000 and $315,000, requiring gross adjustments of 9%, 14% and 22% respectively. Verification also establishes that the first sale is the closest competitive substitute and its adjustments are better supported than the other two. Which indication deserves the most weight on those facts?
When reconciling value indications from the three approaches to value, an appraiser should:
A property sold at a cash-equivalent price of $1,062,500. Its stabilized annual NOI is $85,000. What is the indicated overall rate?
In reconciliation, an appraiser should:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Related Tools
Previous Question
Three comparables produce adjusted indications of $312,000, $309,000 and $315,000, requiring gross adjustments of 9%, 14% and 22% respectively. Verification also establishes that the first sale is the closest competitive substitute and its adjustments are better supported than the other two. Which indication deserves the most weight on those facts?
Next Question
Which two depreciation categories may each be classified as curable or incurable by comparing the cost to remedy a deficiency with the value gained?
