The financially feasible test in highest and best use analysis determines whether:
Correct Answer
B) The use will generate adequate returns to justify the investment
Financial feasibility asks whether the proposed use supports its costs and the appropriate required return. Maximum productivity then compares supported values among feasible uses. Legal permission and physical capability are necessary initial conditions but do not by themselves establish adequate economics.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because the financially feasible test asks whether a proposed use supports its costs and the appropriate required return. Uses that produce a positive return after operating expenses, debt service and investment recapture are regarded as financially feasible. Maximum productivity then compares the feasible uses to find the highest value.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: The use generates the highest possible return of the uses tested
Option A, the use generating the highest possible return of the uses tested, describes maximal productivity, the final test. Financial feasibility only screens for adequate returns before that comparison.
Option C: The use is allowed by the zoning ordinance
Option C, the use being allowed by the zoning ordinance, is the legally permissible test. Legal permission is a necessary condition but does not show the use produces adequate returns.
Option D: The use can be physically constructed
Option D, the use being physically constructible, is the physically possible test. Physical capability does not by itself establish that the economics work.
Legal, Physical, Financial, Maximal
The four tests in order are Legally permissible, Physically possible, Financially feasible and Maximally productive; feasible means it pays for itself with an adequate return, and maximal means it pays the most.
How to use: Use the order to tell feasible (adequate return) apart from maximal (highest return).
Exam Tip
If an answer says 'highest' or 'most', it describes maximal productivity, not financial feasibility.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Confusing financial feasibility with maximal productivity
- -Assuming a legally permitted use is automatically feasible
- -Treating physical possibility as proof of adequate returns
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the separate roles of the four highest and best use tests. Financial feasibility asks whether a use produces enough return to justify its costs. It is distinct from legal permissibility, physical possibility and maximal productivity, which picks the best among feasible uses.
Background Knowledge
Highest and best use is tested for uses that are legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible and maximally productive. Financial feasibility narrows the field to uses that can cover costs and provide an adequate return. Of those, the use producing the highest value is the highest and best use.
Real-World Application
An appraiser considers single-family, duplex and fourplex uses for a vacant site. Fourplex use fails financial feasibility because projected rents cannot cover costs and a required return, while single-family and duplex uses pass and move on to the maximal productivity comparison.
More Market Questions
Market analysis confirms that seller financing at 3%, versus a 6% market rate, increased a comparable sale price. What adjustment removes that financing premium?
At the same effective date, reliable value indications support $800,000 for continued use of a property as improved and $500,000 for its cleared site. Immediate demolition costs $100,000. These are the only feasible alternatives, with no other costs or timing differences. Which alternative has the higher net value?
Other relevant conditions equal, growth in the number of households with effective purchasing power in a market tends to have which effect?
In a lakefront market, paired sales show that direct water frontage has the largest price effect of any feature. Which approach to comparable selection best follows from this evidence?
Which circumstance can cause highest and best use as improved to differ from highest and best use as though vacant?
A small group of buyers in a market looks for specialized features that are uncommon in the broader housing supply. What term describes this group?
A neighborhood analysis should include all of the following EXCEPT:
A site legally permits at most 40 units and can physically support 50. Supported comparable analyses find 30 and 40 units financially feasible, with 40 units producing the highest net land value after costs, timing and required return. Which use is maximally productive among these alternatives?
Market evidence isolates a subject value loss from off-site landfill odors. Which listed cause is an external-obsolescence influence?
Which proposed use cannot pass the legal-permissibility screen without evidence that the necessary permission is reasonably probable?
People Also Study
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
Which principle should govern priority among location, physical characteristics, timing and transaction conditions when selecting comparables?
Next Question
A luxury segment recorded 12 closed sales over three months and has 8 pending contracts. Using only completed sales for this historical measure, what is the average closed-sales rate per month?