EstatePass
MarketHARD13.6% of exam

A site legally permits at most 40 units and can physically support 50. Supported comparable analyses find 30 and 40 units financially feasible, with 40 units producing the highest net land value after costs, timing and required return. Which use is maximally productive among these alternatives?

Correct Answer

B) 40 units, because it yields the highest supported net land value

Among legally permissible, physically possible and financially feasible alternatives, select the highest supported net land value on a compatible risk/timing basis. A legal maximum alone does not establish feasibility or productivity; a higher gross rent or percentage return alone would not suffice.

Answer Options
A
30 units, since that option carries the least development risk
B
40 units, because it yields the highest supported net land value
C
50 units, despite the legal maximum of 40 units on the site
D
No use at all, because financial feasibility is irrelevant here

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option B is correct because 40 units is legally permissible, physically possible and financially feasible, and the supported analyses show it produces the highest net land value after costs, timing and required return. The maximally productive use is the most productive use among the financially feasible uses.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: 30 units, since that option carries the least development risk

Option A, 30 units because it carries the least development risk, is wrong because the analyses already account for risk and timing, and 30 units produces a lower net land value than 40 units. Lowest risk alone does not make a use maximally productive.

Option C: 50 units, despite the legal maximum of 40 units on the site

Option C, 50 units despite the legal maximum of 40, is wrong because a use that exceeds the legal maximum fails the legally permissible test. Physical capacity cannot override zoning limits.

Option D: No use at all, because financial feasibility is irrelevant here

Option D, no use at all because financial feasibility is irrelevant, is wrong because financial feasibility is one of the core highest and best use tests, and the facts show two feasible uses.

Legal, Possible, Feasible, Maximal

Run the four tests in order like filters. Only uses that pass the first three compete for the highest land value.

How to use: Use this when a question offers several development options and asks which is highest and best use.

Exam Tip

Eliminate any option that exceeds legal limits first, then compare remaining feasible options by supported land value.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Choosing the physically largest project despite zoning limits
  • -Picking the lowest-risk option without comparing land value
  • -Treating the legal maximum as automatically maximally productive

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

This question tests the maximally productive test of highest and best use. First screen out uses that are not legally permissible, physically possible or financially feasible, then pick the remaining use with the highest supported land value. The 50-unit option fails the legal test, and of the feasible options, 40 units gives the highest net land value.

Background Knowledge

Highest and best use is tested in order: legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible and maximally productive. Among uses that pass the first three tests, the one producing the highest land value is maximally productive.

Real-World Application

A developer asks an appraiser to value a site zoned for up to 40 units. The appraiser models 30- and 40-unit projects with market rents, costs and required returns and concludes that the 40-unit project yields the highest land value.

highest and best usemaximally productivefinancially feasiblelegally permissibleland value
Was this explanation helpful?

More Market Questions

Market analysis confirms that seller financing at 3%, versus a 6% market rate, increased a comparable sale price. What adjustment removes that financing premium?

At the same effective date, reliable value indications support $800,000 for continued use of a property as improved and $500,000 for its cleared site. Immediate demolition costs $100,000. These are the only feasible alternatives, with no other costs or timing differences. Which alternative has the higher net value?

Other relevant conditions equal, growth in the number of households with effective purchasing power in a market tends to have which effect?

In a lakefront market, paired sales show that direct water frontage has the largest price effect of any feature. Which approach to comparable selection best follows from this evidence?

Which circumstance can cause highest and best use as improved to differ from highest and best use as though vacant?

A small group of buyers in a market looks for specialized features that are uncommon in the broader housing supply. What term describes this group?

A neighborhood analysis should include all of the following EXCEPT:

Market evidence isolates a subject value loss from off-site landfill odors. Which listed cause is an external-obsolescence influence?

Which proposed use cannot pass the legal-permissibility screen without evidence that the necessary permission is reasonably probable?

In the neighborhood life cycle, which stage is marked by relatively stable values and little new construction?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing