Which considerations provide the soundest basis for reconciling appraisal indications?
Correct Answer
A) Method applicability, data quality and quantity, and consistency of the analysis.
Reconciliation considers the quality and quantity of the available data and the applicability and relevance of the methods used. Check calculations and consistency as part of evaluating reliability. A numerical average does not by itself explain why the resulting opinion is supported.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because USPAP calls for reconciling the quality and quantity of data analyzed within the approaches and the applicability and relevance of the approaches, methods and techniques used. Checking calculations and consistency is part of evaluating reliability. Together these considerations explain why the resulting opinion is supported.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: The client’s preferred number and the report’s page count.
Option B, the client's preferred number and the report's page count, is wrong because client preference would compromise impartiality and report length says nothing about the reliability of an indication.
Option C: The highest indication and the time spent developing it.
Option C, the highest indication and the time spent developing it, is wrong because neither magnitude nor effort measures reliability. A time-consuming analysis can still rest on weak data.
Option D: The arithmetic mean of the indications, without reviewing the evidence that supports them.
Option D, the arithmetic mean without reviewing supporting evidence, is wrong because an average does not explain why the opinion is supported and may blend reliable and unreliable indications.
Fit, data, consistency
Reconcile by asking whether each method fits, how good and plentiful its data are, and whether the analysis is consistent.
How to use: Use this when a question asks for the proper basis for reconciling indications.
Exam Tip
The right answer usually names applicability and data quality. Answers about the client, page count, effort or averaging are distractors.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Relying on the average of indications as the explanation
- -Considering the client's preferred value
- -Equating effort spent with reliability
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the criteria used in reconciliation. Sound reconciliation looks at how applicable each method is, the quality and quantity of its data, and whether the analysis is consistent and accurate. Client preference, effort and simple averages are not valid criteria.
Background Knowledge
Reconciliation criteria commonly include the appropriateness of each approach, the accuracy and quantity of data, and the consistency with which the approaches were applied. These factors allow the appraiser to explain and defend the final opinion of value.
Real-World Application
Reconciling an appraisal of a fourplex, an appraiser notes that rent and capitalization data are plentiful and consistent while comparable sales are few and dated. The appraiser explains that the income approach has stronger data and greater applicability and weights it accordingly.
More Reconciliation Questions
In a cost approach for an improved property, an appraiser estimates site value by sales comparison, allocation and extraction, then settles on one site-value figure before final reconciliation. How is this step best described?
An extraordinary assumption was reasonably supported, properly used and disclosed in an appraisal report. Later, the assumed information is found to be false. Which conclusion is best supported?
An otherwise applicable valuation approach cannot be developed reliably from the available data. The remaining scope can produce credible assignment results. What should the appraiser do?
May an appraiser use a hypothetical condition in any assignment?
An appraisal has a current effective date and permits an extraordinary assumption if its requirements are met. Which situation involves uncertain information rather than a fact known to be contrary to reality on that date?
Why must a report identify any real property interest that is being excluded from the value opinion?
Which review best helps explain divergent cost, sales-comparison and income indications?
Two value indications are $340,000 and $392,000. What is the difference as a percentage of the lower indication, rounded to one decimal place?
An unauthorized third party requests a lender-client’s report. No due-process or other permitted disclosure exception applies. How should the appraiser respond?
An appraiser proposes to assume there are no hidden defects. Which fact would characterize that assumption as extraordinary under the USPAP 2024 definition, rather than justify dismissing it as routine boilerplate?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam