What should result from reconciliation of the applicable appraisal indications?
Correct Answer
B) A supported final opinion in the form appropriate to the assignment.
Reconciliation resolves the evidence into a supported final opinion. The assignment may call for a point, permitted range or relationship to a benchmark; a single point is not a universal USPAP requirement. Multiple unexplained indications do not communicate a reasoned conclusion.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because reconciliation resolves the evidence into a supported final opinion of value. That opinion may be a point, a permitted range or a relationship to a benchmark, depending on the assignment. USPAP calls for summarizing the reasoning that supports the conclusions, including reconciliation of the data and approaches.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Three unexplained competing numbers with no conclusion.
Option A, three unexplained competing numbers with no conclusion, is the opposite of reconciliation. Multiple unexplained indications do not communicate a reasoned conclusion to the reader.
Option C: The highest numerical indication, apart from its support.
Option C, taking the highest numerical indication apart from its support, ignores the quality of the evidence. Weight in reconciliation follows reliability and relevance, not the size of the number.
Option D: An unexamined average required whenever three approaches are developed.
Option D describes an unexamined average required whenever three approaches are developed. No such averaging requirement exists, and an unexamined average skips the analysis that reconciliation is meant to provide.
Many numbers in, one opinion out
Picture a funnel: several indications go in the top, and a single supported opinion comes out the bottom. The funnel is the reasoning, not a calculator.
How to use: Use this image when an option leaves several numbers unresolved or replaces reasoning with a formula.
Exam Tip
Choose the answer that stresses support and reasoning. Options that pick a number by size or by mechanical averaging are usually distractors in reconciliation questions.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Reporting several approach results without stating a final conclusion
- -Believing a single point value is the only acceptable form of opinion
- -Treating reconciliation as a simple average of the approaches
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the purpose of reconciliation. Reconciliation takes the indications from the approaches and data used and resolves them into one reasoned conclusion. Look for the answer that describes a supported opinion presented in whatever form the assignment calls for.
Background Knowledge
Reconciliation is the final analytical step in which the appraiser weighs the quality and quantity of data and the applicability of each approach. The result is a final opinion expressed in the form the assignment requires, such as a single point, a range or a relationship to a benchmark.
Real-World Application
An appraiser has a sales comparison indication of $412,000 and a cost indication of $430,000 for a tract home. She explains that the sales data are recent and close in comparability while the cost approach depends on estimated depreciation, and she concludes at $415,000 with that reasoning stated in the report.
More Reconciliation Questions
In a cost approach for an improved property, an appraiser estimates site value by sales comparison, allocation and extraction, then settles on one site-value figure before final reconciliation. How is this step best described?
An extraordinary assumption was reasonably supported, properly used and disclosed in an appraisal report. Later, the assumed information is found to be false. Which conclusion is best supported?
An otherwise applicable valuation approach cannot be developed reliably from the available data. The remaining scope can produce credible assignment results. What should the appraiser do?
May an appraiser use a hypothetical condition in any assignment?
An appraisal has a current effective date and permits an extraordinary assumption if its requirements are met. Which situation involves uncertain information rather than a fact known to be contrary to reality on that date?
Why must a report identify any real property interest that is being excluded from the value opinion?
Which review best helps explain divergent cost, sales-comparison and income indications?
Two value indications are $340,000 and $392,000. What is the difference as a percentage of the lower indication, rounded to one decimal place?
An unauthorized third party requests a lender-client’s report. No due-process or other permitted disclosure exception applies. How should the appraiser respond?
An appraiser proposes to assume there are no hidden defects. Which fact would characterize that assumption as extraordinary under the USPAP 2024 definition, rather than justify dismissing it as routine boilerplate?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam