EstatePass
Land/SiteMEDIUM4.5% of exam

The subject vacant site is near a high-pressure gas transmission pipeline. A comparable vacant site that is not near such a pipeline sold for $800,000. Paired land sales indicate a discount of $170,000 for pipeline proximity. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated land value of the subject?

Correct Answer

D) $630,000

Adjust the comparable toward the subject: $800,000 − $170,000 = $630,000. An inferior subject requires this downward adjustment to the comparable.

Answer Options
A
$800,000
B
$970,000
C
$460,000
D
$630,000

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option D is correct because the comparable without the stigma sold for $800,000 and the supported stigma discount is $170,000. Since the subject is inferior, the comparable's price is adjusted downward: $800,000 − $170,000 = $630,000. That adjusted price is the indicated land value for the subject.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: $800,000

Option A, $800,000, is the comparable's unadjusted sale price. It ignores the supported $170,000 stigma discount; the correct indication is $800,000 − $170,000 = $630,000.

Option B: $970,000

Option B, $970,000, adds the discount instead of subtracting it: $800,000 + $170,000 = $970,000. Because the subject is inferior, the comparable is adjusted downward to $630,000.

Option C: $460,000

Option C, $460,000, subtracts the $170,000 discount twice: $800,000 − $340,000 = $460,000. Only one supported adjustment applies, giving $630,000.

Comp better, subtract

If the comparable is better than the subject, take value away from the comparable; if it is worse, add value to it.

How to use: Use this whenever you must decide the sign of an adjustment in a sales comparison grid.

Exam Tip

Identify first whether the subject or the comparable has the advantage, then remember that the adjustment is applied to the comparable's price.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Adding the discount to the comparable because the subject has the stigma
  • -Adjusting the subject instead of the comparable
  • -Applying the same adjustment twice

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

This question tests the direction of a paired-sales adjustment in vacant land sales comparison. The comparable lacks the pipeline proximity stigma, so it is superior to the subject. Adjustments are made to the comparable to make it like the subject, so a superior comparable is adjusted downward.

Background Knowledge

Paired sales analysis isolates the price effect of one characteristic by comparing sales that are similar except for that feature. The measured difference is then applied to comparables to adjust them toward the subject, downward when the comparable is superior and upward when it is inferior.

Real-World Application

An appraiser values a vacant lot next to a high-pressure gas transmission line. Paired sales of otherwise similar lots near and away from such lines show a measurable discount, which the appraiser subtracts from an unaffected comparable's price to indicate the subject's value.

paired salesstigmaadjustment directionvacant landsales comparison
Was this explanation helpful?

More Land/Site Questions

How should an appraiser account for a site's access to public sewer compared with competing sites that require septic systems?

Which fact, if supported by competitive-market evidence, most directly supports a unit-price premium for an otherwise comparable site?

A rectangular site's frontage is doubled while its depth is halved, keeping area constant. What is the likely value effect in a retail district?

A downtown site's zoning height limit is reduced from six stories to three. Buyers in this market had been paying for six-story development potential. What effect on land value is most supportable?

A zoning change increases permitted density from four to eight units per acre. What is the likely effect on site value?

Using the allocation method, market evidence supports a typical land-to-total-property-value ratio of 28% for similar improved properties in the subject’s location. An improved comparable sold for $825,000. What land (site) contribution is indicated by applying that ratio?

An appraiser is valuing a vacant site near a landfill. A similar vacant site that is not affected by the landfill sold for $480,000. Paired land sales indicate that proximity to the landfill lowers site prices by $70,000. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated value of the subject site?

An appraiser is extracting site value from a $600,000 cash sale. The seller's records show an original construction cost of $250,000 and a depreciated book value of $110,000. The appraiser estimates current replacement cost new at $400,000 and accrued depreciation from all causes at $100,000. What is the indicated site value?

Three parcels assembled under single ownership (standard appraisal guidance assemblage) support separate as-is values of $290,000, $340,000, and $250,000. After assemblage for a higher-utility use, the combined site is valued at $1,050,000. Assemblage costs (demolition, legal, holding, and related) total $55,000. What is the indicated net plottage (plottage increment after assemblage costs)?

A comparable commercial site with 65 front feet sold for a cash-equivalent price of $585,000. Per standard appraisal guidance, sale price per front foot is a vacant-land unit of comparison when frontage is a primary value determinant. The subject site has 72 front feet and is otherwise similar. What indicated land value does the front-foot unit support before other adjustments?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing