In the breakdown method, the sequence of deductions is:
Correct Answer
D) Curable physical, then short-lived incurable, then long-lived incurable
Why this is correct: The breakdown method uses a specific sequence to avoid double-counting depreciation. First, deduct the cost to cure any curable physical items. Next, deduct depreciation for short-lived incurable components (like a roof) based on their individual remaining life. Finally, apply the depreciation rate for the long-lived incurable structure (the main building shell) to the remaining cost. Why the other choices are wrong: "Long-lived first, then short-lived, then curable items" is wrong; this incorrect order would miscalculate the base for the long-lived depreciation. "Any order, since all deductions total the same figure" is wrong; order matters because later deductions are applied to a reduced base. "External deductions first, since they affect the entire property value" is wrong; external obsolescence is applied last in the breakdown method. Exam tip: Sequence is key: Curable, Short-lived, Long-lived. Think "Cure, Specific, General."
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Why this is correct: The breakdown method uses a specific sequence to avoid double-counting depreciation. First, deduct the cost to cure any curable physical items. Next, deduct depreciation for short-lived incurable components (like a roof) based on their individual remaining life. Finally, apply the depreciation rate for the long-lived incurable structure (the main building shell) to the remaining cost. Why the other choices are wrong: "Long-lived first, then short-lived, then curable items" is wrong; this incorrect order would miscalculate the base for the long-lived depreciation. "Any order, since all deductions total the same figure" is wrong; order matters because later deductions are applied to a reduced base. "External deductions first, since they affect the entire property value" is wrong; external obsolescence is applied last in the breakdown method. Exam tip: Sequence is key: Curable, Short-lived, Long-lived. Think "Cure, Specific, General."
More cost-approach Questions
In a cost approach for a proposed building, the appropriate cost basis is generally:
A 45-year-old office building has undergone multiple high-quality renovations, including HVAC replacement, seismic retrofitting, and full interior modernization. Its functional layout remains competitive with new construction, and it occupies a stable, well-located corridor. The appraiser estimates its total economic life at 70 years. Which estimate of effective age is most supportable under USPAP and recognized cost approach methodology?
A warehouse cost $210,000 to build when the cost index stood at 105. The index is now 210. Its indicated current cost is:
An appraiser is estimating accrued depreciation for a commercial office building using the age-life method. The building was constructed in 1992 and has a total economic life of 60 years. As of the appraisal date in 2024, the appraiser determines the property’s effective age is 36 years due to consistent maintenance, modernized systems, and favorable market perception. What is the percent of accrued depreciation indicated by the age-life method?
Which event would RAISE a building's effective age relative to last year's estimate?
Two identical houses were built the same year; one has been meticulously maintained, the other neglected. Their age-life analyses differ because:
Which statement is MOST consistent with USPAP Standards Rule 6 regarding the identification and treatment of external obsolescence in the cost approach?
A 40-year-old industrial warehouse has undergone no major renovations and suffers from outdated electrical systems, inefficient insulation, and obsolescent loading dock design. Market evidence indicates similar properties typically exhibit functional obsolescence reducing utility by 15% and external obsolescence reducing value by 10%. If the appraiser uses the age-life method with a total economic life of 50 years, how should effective age be adjusted to reflect these conditions?
In developing an age-life depreciation estimate, an appraiser assigns an effective age of 16 years and a total economic life of 40 years. Later, the appraiser discovers that comparable properties in the same submarket have recently sold with effective ages averaging 12 years and total economic lives averaging 45 years — and those sales exhibited superior energy efficiency and adaptive reuse features. What is the appraiser’s USPAP-compliant obligation regarding the original effective age estimate?
The age-life method expresses depreciation as:
People Also Study
Valuation Principles & Procedures
25% of exam
Property Description & Analysis
20% of exam
Market Analysis & Highest/Best Use
15% of exam
Appraisal Math & Statistics
15% of exam
USPAP (Ethics & Standards)
15% of exam