In reconciliation, which approach or combination of approaches should receive the greatest weight?
Correct Answer
A) The one that best measures the type of benefits the property yields
The greatest weight should be given to the approach or combination of approaches that best measures the type of benefits the subject property yields.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because the greatest weight should be given to the approach or combination of approaches that best measures the type of benefits the subject property yields. This ties the weighting to the property's actual nature and its market. An approach that captures those benefits most directly is the most relevant measure of value.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: The one that produces the highest indication of value for the client
Option B, choosing the approach that produces the highest indication for the client, is client advocacy. Weight must come from relevance and support, and appraisers must remain impartial.
Option C: The one that used the largest number of comparable data points
Option C picks the approach that used the largest number of comparable data points. Quantity of data matters, but many weak data points do not outweigh an approach that better measures the property's benefits.
Option D: The one required by the lender’s standard appraisal report form
Option D defers to whatever a lender's standard report form requires. A form organizes reporting; it does not decide which approach is most reliable for a given property.
Measure the benefit
Ask what the buyer is actually paying for: shelter, income or utility. Give the most weight to the approach that measures that benefit.
How to use: Use this question whenever you must decide which approach deserves the greatest weight.
Exam Tip
Look for wording about the type of benefits the property yields. Options based on the highest value, the client, or a form requirement are distractors.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Weighting the approach that gives the client the most favorable number
- -Assuming the approach with the most comparables is the most reliable
- -Letting the report form dictate the reconciliation
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the guiding principle for assigning weight among approaches. The key is to match the approach to how the property produces benefits and how buyers think about it. Income properties are usually best measured by income and owner-occupied homes by comparable sales, but the available evidence in the assignment still determines the weights.
Background Knowledge
Different properties deliver different benefits: owner occupancy, rental income, or specialized utility. The sales comparison approach reflects buyer comparison shopping, the income approach reflects investor returns, and the cost approach reflects substitution by building new.
Real-World Application
An appraiser values a fully rented triplex. Because investors buy such buildings for their income stream, she gives the income approach the greatest weight and uses the sales comparison approach as support.
More Reconciliation Questions
In a cost approach for an improved property, an appraiser estimates site value by sales comparison, allocation and extraction, then settles on one site-value figure before final reconciliation. How is this step best described?
An extraordinary assumption was reasonably supported, properly used and disclosed in an appraisal report. Later, the assumed information is found to be false. Which conclusion is best supported?
An otherwise applicable valuation approach cannot be developed reliably from the available data. The remaining scope can produce credible assignment results. What should the appraiser do?
May an appraiser use a hypothetical condition in any assignment?
An appraisal has a current effective date and permits an extraordinary assumption if its requirements are met. Which situation involves uncertain information rather than a fact known to be contrary to reality on that date?
Why must a report identify any real property interest that is being excluded from the value opinion?
Which review best helps explain divergent cost, sales-comparison and income indications?
Two value indications are $340,000 and $392,000. What is the difference as a percentage of the lower indication, rounded to one decimal place?
An unauthorized third party requests a lender-client’s report. No due-process or other permitted disclosure exception applies. How should the appraiser respond?
An appraiser proposes to assume there are no hidden defects. Which fact would characterize that assumption as extraordinary under the USPAP 2024 definition, rather than justify dismissing it as routine boilerplate?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Previous Question
An appraiser proposes to assume there are no hidden defects. Which fact would characterize that assumption as extraordinary under the USPAP 2024 definition, rather than justify dismissing it as routine boilerplate?
Next Question
Two houses in the same market each have a carefully developed cost approach. One is newly completed and is a proper improvement for its site; the other is 45 years old with several components near the end of their lives. Why is the cost indication usually the more reliable for the new house?