In reconciliation, what does the relevance of an approach refer to?
Correct Answer
A) How well it reflects how such buyers actually behave
For a market-value appraisal, relevant evidence reflects competitive properties and buyer behavior for the subject’s market and appraised rights. Data count, recency and ease of collection may inform analysis, but none alone defines relevance or guarantees an applicable indication.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because, for a market-value appraisal, relevant evidence reflects competitive properties and buyer behavior in the subject's market. An approach is relevant when it mirrors how such buyers actually decide what to pay. Units of comparison and methods should reflect market behavior.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: How many comparable sales the appraiser located
Option B, how many comparable sales the appraiser located, describes quantity of data. Count can inform reliability, but it does not define whether an approach is relevant to buyer behavior.
Option C: How closely its indication matches the other two
Option C, how closely its indication matches the other two, describes agreement. Agreement may corroborate, but an approach can match others and still not reflect how buyers behave.
Option D: How recently the underlying data was collected
Option D, how recently the underlying data was collected, describes timeliness. Recency may inform analysis but does not by itself define relevance.
Relevant means real buyers
Ask: is this how real buyers of this property decide on price? If yes, the approach is relevant.
How to use: Use this question to separate relevance from data count, recency and agreement.
Exam Tip
Relevance is about market behavior. Do not confuse it with quantity of data or with how well results agree.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Equating relevance with the number of comparables
- -Assuming agreement among approaches proves relevance
- -Treating the most recent data as the most relevant by definition
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the meaning of relevance in reconciliation. Relevance concerns whether an approach reflects how typical buyers in the subject's market actually make decisions. Data count, agreement with other approaches and recency are separate considerations.
Background Knowledge
Reconciliation considers both the quality and quantity of data and the applicability and relevance of approaches. Relevance asks whether the approach reflects the thinking of typical market participants for this property type and these property rights.
Real-World Application
In a neighborhood of owner-occupied homes, buyers compare listings rather than rents. The appraiser treats the sales comparison approach as most relevant because it reflects how these buyers behave.
More Reconciliation Questions
In a cost approach for an improved property, an appraiser estimates site value by sales comparison, allocation and extraction, then settles on one site-value figure before final reconciliation. How is this step best described?
An extraordinary assumption was reasonably supported, properly used and disclosed in an appraisal report. Later, the assumed information is found to be false. Which conclusion is best supported?
An otherwise applicable valuation approach cannot be developed reliably from the available data. The remaining scope can produce credible assignment results. What should the appraiser do?
May an appraiser use a hypothetical condition in any assignment?
An appraisal has a current effective date and permits an extraordinary assumption if its requirements are met. Which situation involves uncertain information rather than a fact known to be contrary to reality on that date?
Why must a report identify any real property interest that is being excluded from the value opinion?
Which review best helps explain divergent cost, sales-comparison and income indications?
Two value indications are $340,000 and $392,000. What is the difference as a percentage of the lower indication, rounded to one decimal place?
An unauthorized third party requests a lender-client’s report. No due-process or other permitted disclosure exception applies. How should the appraiser respond?
An appraiser proposes to assume there are no hidden defects. Which fact would characterize that assumption as extraordinary under the USPAP 2024 definition, rather than justify dismissing it as routine boilerplate?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam