In appraisal terminology, assemblage refers to which of the following?
Correct Answer
A) The act of combining adjoining parcels together
Why this is correct: In appraisal terminology, assemblage refers to the act of combining adjoining parcels together. It is the process of acquiring and merging contiguous lots to create a larger, potentially more valuable site. Why the other choices are wrong: "The added value that such a combination creates" is the definition of plottage value or increment, not assemblage. "The division of acreage into individually sold lots" describes subdivision. "The dedication of land for streets and utilities" is a typical requirement in the subdivision process. Exam tip: Assemblage is the process; plottage is the potential value increase from that process. They are a commonly confused pair.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Assemblage is the act of combining adjoining parcels into a single larger tract, distinct from plottage, which is the value increment the combination may produce.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: The added value that such a combination creates
The added value from combination is plottage. Assemblage is the act that may produce it.
Option C: The division of acreage into individually sold lots
Dividing acreage into individually sold lots is subdivision, the reverse process.
Option D: The dedication of land for streets and utilities
Setting aside land for streets and utilities is dedication, a conveyance for public use.
Assemblage Acts, Plottage Pays
Assemblage Acts, Plottage Pays. One is what you do; the other is what you might get for doing it.
How to use: Identify the use the combination enables. Without one, there is assemblage but no plottage.
Exam Tip
Plottage is not automatic. Combining parcels that each already suit their highest and best use adds no value.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Using assemblage and plottage interchangeably
- -Assuming combination always creates value
- -Confusing assemblage with subdivision
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
Assemblage is the act of combining adjoining parcels under one ownership to form a single larger tract. The distinction the question draws is with plottage — the increment in value that results when the combined parcel is worth more than the sum of its parts. Assemblage is the process; plottage is the effect, and the two are not interchangeable. Plottage arises where the larger parcel supports a use that none of the individual parcels could accommodate: a development requiring minimum acreage, a building footprint that will not fit on either lot alone, or frontage sufficient for a use the individual parcels could not achieve. It is not automatic — combining two parcels that each already suit their highest and best use adds nothing. For an appraiser the practical point is that assemblage value must be demonstrated by identifying the use the combination enables, not assumed from the fact of combination. Subdivision is the reverse process, and dedication is a conveyance for public use.
Background Knowledge
Assemblage is the combining of adjoining parcels under one ownership. Plottage is the resulting increment in value where the combined parcel supports a use the individual parcels could not, and it is not automatic.
Real-World Application
An appraiser valuing two adjoining lots identifies a minimum-acreage development the combination enables, and supports plottage value from sales of similarly sized parcels.
More land-or-site-valuation Questions
Under which condition is the land residual technique most applicable?
What is the appraiser's obligation when a site's legal description does not match its apparent physical boundaries?
Why can the same physical parcel carry different values in two assignments?
A site differs from land in that a site is best described as which of the following?
In a built-up area where no vacant land has sold for years, which approach to site value is the usual fallback?
How is entrepreneurial profit treated in the subdivision development method?
A land comparable sold 18 months ago in a market rising about 4 percent a year. What adjustment direction applies?
In a land residual analysis for a proposed office development, the appraiser estimates total annual net operating income (NOI) will be $1,250,000. The improvement value, derived via the cost approach, is $15,000,000. Market evidence indicates a 7.0% overall capitalization rate is appropriate for similar improved properties. What is the indicated land value?
A developer plans a 36-lot residential subdivision on raw land. Each lot is expected to sell for $85,000. Total development costs (excluding land) are $1,420,000, including $220,000 for entrepreneurial incentive. The developer requires a 12% annual yield on invested capital over a 3-year development period. Using the subdivision development method, what is the maximum price the developer should pay for the land if all lots sell at the projected price and timing?
In applying the land residual technique to a proposed subdivision, an appraiser estimates that the time required to fully absorb all lots will be 6 years. The developer requires a 10% annual yield on invested capital. Which discounting approach is most appropriate for converting future net proceeds to present value?
People Also Study
Valuation Principles & Procedures
25% of exam
Property Description & Analysis
20% of exam
Market Analysis & Highest/Best Use
15% of exam
Appraisal Math & Statistics
15% of exam
USPAP (Ethics & Standards)
15% of exam