In an appraisal report, an assumption that the property is free of hazardous materials is:
Correct Answer
D) A general assumption that should be disclosed
Why this is correct: In a typical limited inspection, the appraiser assumes the property is free of hazardous materials without specific testing. This is a "general assumption" that should be disclosed in the report to inform the user of the basis for the appraisal. It becomes an extraordinary assumption only if there is a specific reason to suspect contamination and the appraiser assumes it away anyway. Why the other choices are wrong: "Unnecessary to state in any report" is wrong because USPAP requires disclosure of assumptions that affect the analysis. "An extraordinary assumption in every case" is wrong; it is only extraordinary if there is a known suspicion of a problem. "A hypothetical condition requiring prominence" is wrong; a hypothetical condition assumes something contrary to fact, which is not the case here. Exam tip: General assumptions are common and should be disclosed; they become extraordinary only when there is specific suspicion.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
In the ordinary case this is a general assumption reflecting that no environmental investigation was performed, and it should be disclosed among the report's assumptions and limiting conditions.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Unnecessary to state in any report
An unstated assumption informs nobody. The reader needs to know that no environmental investigation was performed.
Option B: An extraordinary assumption in every case
It becomes extraordinary only where there is specific reason to doubt it and being wrong would change the conclusions.
Option C: A hypothetical condition requiring prominence
A hypothetical condition is contrary to a known fact. Absent knowledge of contamination, nothing contrary to fact is assumed.
Routine Until There Is a Reason
Routine Until There Is a Reason. Same words, different category, once you have grounds to doubt it.
How to use: Ask what you know about the property. Industrial history or visible evidence promotes the assumption to extraordinary.
Exam Tip
Classification depends on circumstances rather than on wording, which is why these questions describe the property's history as well as the statement.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Omitting the assumption entirely
- -Treating every assumption as extraordinary
- -Classifying it as a hypothetical condition
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
An assumption that a property is free of hazardous materials is a general assumption in the ordinary case: the appraiser is not an environmental professional, has no basis to detect contamination visually, and states the assumption so a reader understands that no environmental investigation was performed. It should be disclosed among the report's assumptions and limiting conditions rather than left unsaid, since an unstated assumption cannot inform anyone. What it is not, ordinarily, is either of the heightened categories. It is not a hypothetical condition, because nothing contrary to a known fact is being assumed — the appraiser has no knowledge of contamination. And it is not automatically an extraordinary assumption, because an extraordinary assumption is uncertain, specific to the assignment, and consequential if false. That said, circumstances can change the classification: a property with a known industrial history, visible staining, or an adjacent contaminated site presents specific reason for doubt, and the same words then become an extraordinary assumption requiring prominent disclosure.
Background Knowledge
General assumptions are routine conditions disclosed among a report's assumptions and limiting conditions. An extraordinary assumption is specific to the assignment, uncertain, and would alter the conclusions if false. A hypothetical condition is contrary to a known fact.
Real-World Application
An appraiser lists the hazardous materials assumption in standard limiting conditions on a suburban house, and elevates it to a prominently disclosed extraordinary assumption on a former industrial site.
More USPAP Questions
Which statement best defines a hypothetical condition under USPAP?
According to the Competency Rule, if an appraiser lacks the knowledge and experience to complete an assignment competently, which action is NOT acceptable?
An appraiser runs only the sales comparison approach on a standard tract home and omits the cost and income approaches. Under Standard 1 this is:
A value opinion for a subdivision as if fully built out two years from now is what kind of assignment, and what does it require?
A hypothetical condition differs from an extraordinary assumption in that a hypothetical condition:
An appraiser must disclose in the certification whether they have:
A client-imposed requirement — 'use only comps from our approved list' — is best described as:
Under Standard 1, when developing a real property appraisal, an appraiser must:
The certification required by Standards Rule 2-3 must be signed by:
According to Standard 1, when developing an opinion of market value, an appraiser must analyze:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Related Tools
Previous Question
An appraiser is asked to complete an assignment using only the cost approach due to a local regulation, even though USPAP would normally require consideration of all three approaches. This situation would require:
Next Question
What is the key difference between an Appraisal Report and a Restricted Appraisal Report?