An appraiser asked to appraise a property they previously appraised for a different client must:
Correct Answer
C) Disclose the prior service to the new client before accepting
Why this is correct: The Ethics Rule requires disclosure of any prior service involving the same property within a specified look-back period (typically three years) to the prospective client before accepting the assignment. This allows the client to assess potential bias or conflict. Why the other choices are wrong: 'Provide the prior report to the new client' is wrong; the prior report is confidential to the prior client unless they authorize its release. 'Decline because of the previous engagement' is wrong; prior service does not automatically prohibit a new assignment if properly disclosed. 'Charge exactly the same fee as was charged for the prior assignment' is wrong; fees are negotiable and not regulated by this rule. Exam tip: Remember the sequence: disclose before accepting, and disclose again in the certification.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option C is correct because disclosure of the prior service to the prospective client before accepting the assignment is precisely what the Ethics Rule requires. The timing element is essential, since disclosure after acceptance would deprive the client of the choice the rule exists to protect. It also correctly implies that the appraiser may proceed once disclosure is made. What must be revealed is the fact of the prior service, not the confidential results of it.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Provide the prior report to the new client
The prior report belongs to the prior assignment and its results are confidential to that client, so handing it to a new client without authorization would breach the Ethics Rule's confidentiality provisions. Disclosing that prior services occurred and disclosing what they concluded are entirely different acts. This is the trap that catches candidates who correctly remember disclosure is required but do not distinguish fact from content.
Option B: Decline because of the previous engagement
Prior involvement with a property does not automatically disqualify an appraiser, and a blanket rule to that effect would make it impossible to appraise frequently transacted properties or to perform updates for new clients. The rule's remedy is transparency, letting the client evaluate the situation. Declining is appropriate only where the appraiser cannot be impartial or where a genuine conflict exists.
Option D: Charge exactly the same fee as was charged for the prior assignment
Fees are a commercial matter between appraiser and client, negotiated on the scope and complexity of the work, and no USPAP provision fixes them by reference to a prior engagement. Charging the same amount would address nothing about bias or disclosure. The option attaches an irrelevant condition to a rule about transparency.
Say That You Did, Not What You Said
Disclose that you did prior work; never disclose what you concluded. The new client is entitled to know you have been here before within three years so they can judge the risk of bias. The old client still owns the number you gave them.
How to use: For prior involvement questions, check the timing and the content separately. Disclosure must come before acceptance, and it covers the existence of the prior service, not its results. Reject options releasing the old report, refusing the work outright, or attaching fee conditions.
Exam Tip
Remember the three-year window covers services in any capacity, not only appraisals; brokerage, management, or consulting on the same property triggers the same disclosure.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Disclosing the prior conclusion rather than only the fact of prior service
- -Making the disclosure after accepting the assignment instead of before
- -Overlooking non-appraisal prior services such as brokerage or property management
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the prior services disclosure obligation in the Ethics Rule. An appraiser must disclose to a prospective client any services regarding the subject property performed within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of the assignment, whether those services were performed as an appraiser or in any other capacity, such as broker, property manager, or consultant. The disclosure runs before acceptance, which is the point of it: the client can then decide whether the prior involvement creates a bias concern before committing to the engagement. Note that the rule requires disclosing that the prior service occurred, not disclosing its content, since the earlier assignment results remain confidential to the earlier client absent that client's authorization. This is a distinction candidates frequently blur. Prior involvement does not disqualify the appraiser, and appraisers routinely appraise the same property more than once for different clients, but undisclosed prior involvement is a breach regardless of whether the new opinion was actually influenced. The certification in the new report also addresses whether the appraiser has performed prior services on the property.
Background Knowledge
You need to know the Ethics Rule's four sections covering conduct, management, confidentiality, and record keeping obligations, and specifically the requirement to disclose prior services on the subject property within the three years preceding acceptance. You should also know that confidentiality restricts disclosure of assignment results to the client, authorized parties, enforcement agencies and third parties authorized by due process of law, and duly authorized peer review committees.
Real-World Application
Contacted by a new lender about a property she appraised fourteen months earlier for a different lender, an appraiser discloses the prior assignment in writing before accepting, declines to share the earlier report or its conclusion absent the first client's authorization, and addresses the prior service in the new report's certification.
More USPAP Questions
Which statement best defines a hypothetical condition under USPAP?
According to the Competency Rule, if an appraiser lacks the knowledge and experience to complete an assignment competently, which action is NOT acceptable?
An appraiser runs only the sales comparison approach on a standard tract home and omits the cost and income approaches. Under Standard 1 this is:
A value opinion for a subdivision as if fully built out two years from now is what kind of assignment, and what does it require?
A hypothetical condition differs from an extraordinary assumption in that a hypothetical condition:
An appraiser must disclose in the certification whether they have:
A client-imposed requirement — 'use only comps from our approved list' — is best described as:
Under Standard 1, when developing a real property appraisal, an appraiser must:
The certification required by Standards Rule 2-3 must be signed by:
According to Standard 1, when developing an opinion of market value, an appraiser must analyze:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam