How does the Fannie Mae Selling Guide define a neighborhood?
Correct Answer
B) A congruous group of complementary land uses
Fannie Mae defines a neighborhood as a congruous group of complementary land uses. It is not a statistical tract, a fixed radius or a single subdivision.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because the Fannie Mae Selling Guide defines a neighborhood as a congruous group of complementary land uses. The definition focuses on compatible uses that function together, not on administrative or fixed boundaries.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: A census tract used for lending statistics
Option A, a census tract used for lending statistics, is wrong because a census tract is a statistical area. It does not match the definition based on complementary land uses.
Option C: The area within one mile of the subject property
Option C, the area within one mile of the subject, is wrong because a neighborhood is defined by complementary land uses, not by a fixed radius.
Option D: A single subdivision with one builder
Option D, a single subdivision with one builder, is wrong because a neighborhood can include several subdivisions and other complementary uses. It is not limited to one builder's project.
Complementary uses fit together
A neighborhood is a congruous group of complementary land uses, pieces that fit and work together.
How to use: Use this when asked how Fannie Mae defines a neighborhood.
Exam Tip
Eliminate answers that define a neighborhood by a radius, a census tract or a single builder.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Using a fixed radius as the neighborhood
- -Equating a census tract with a neighborhood
- -Limiting the neighborhood to one subdivision
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the Fannie Mae definition of neighborhood. The Selling Guide defines a neighborhood as a congruous group of complementary land uses. It is not a statistical tract, a fixed radius or a single builder's subdivision.
Background Knowledge
Neighborhood analysis begins with identifying boundaries and characteristics of a congruous group of complementary land uses. Homes, schools, shopping and parks that function together can form one neighborhood. Boundaries often follow physical features or changes in land use.
Real-World Application
An appraiser identifies a neighborhood made up of single-family homes, a nearby elementary school and a small shopping center, bounded by a highway and a creek. These uses complement one another. The appraiser describes those boundaries in the report.
More Market Questions
In market area analysis, what characteristic distinguishes a district from a neighborhood?
Under USPAP Standards Rule 1-3(a), which item must an appraiser identify and analyze when necessary for credible results in a market value assignment?
Several homes in a neighborhood are vacant and boarded up. Which market force does Fannie Mae classify this as?
Infrastructure investment such as a new interchange typically affects nearby land by:
A city raises property tax rates and tightens building regulations. Which market force does Fannie Mae classify these as?
An appraiser believes, without market evidence, that a nearby group home lowers values. What does Fannie Mae require?
Which three categories are used to report the supply of properties in a Fannie Mae neighborhood section?
An appraiser is asked for a retrospective value opinion as of three years ago. When must the appraiser meet the Competency Rule?
Can mixed land uses in a residential neighborhood ever enhance home values, according to Fannie Mae?
In Mueller’s occupancy-based four-phase real-estate cycle framework, which phase describes falling occupancy as continuing supply growth overtakes demand?
People Also Study
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
Why does land suitable for a specific use come into especially short supply in a growing area?
Next Question
A vacant site can legally and physically hold either a medical office building or a small retail center. Both are financially feasible and, on a risk-adjusted basis, would produce the same land value. How should the highest and best use conclusion treat them?
