'Credible' as USPAP uses the term means:
Correct Answer
B) Worthy of belief, measured in the context of the intended use
Why this is correct: In USPAP, 'credible' means 'worthy of belief.' This is measured in the context of the assignment's intended use—what is credible for one use may not be for another. Why the other choices are wrong: 'Certified as accurate by a second appraiser' is wrong; peer review is not required for credibility. 'Within ten percent of the property's eventual sale price' is wrong; there is no fixed numerical tolerance for credibility. 'Acceptable to the client who ordered the work' is wrong; client acceptance does not define USPAP credibility. Exam tip: Credibility is not perfection. It means the results are believable and supportable for the specific intended use.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Worthy of belief, measured in the context of the intended use, states both halves of the definition, and the second half is the part exam questions probe. Working with it means asking, for each analytical decision, whether the evidence and logic assembled would persuade a knowledgeable reader given what the report will be used for. It also gives the appraiser a defensible way to explain scope decisions, since a narrower scope is justified by demonstrating that the results remain credible for this intended use rather than by pointing to a fee or a deadline. Where the appraiser concludes that a requested scope will not produce credible results, the correct response is to expand the scope or decline the assignment.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Certified as accurate by a second appraiser
Nothing in USPAP requires a second appraiser to certify or review work for it to be credible, and appraisal review is a separate discipline with its own standards rather than a precondition to credibility. Review may test whether results are credible, but its absence does not make them incredible. The option confuses a quality control process with the definition.
Option C: Within ten percent of the property's eventual sale price
USPAP sets no numerical tolerance, and tying credibility to an eventual sale price would judge a date-specific opinion against a later event under later market conditions. A well-supported opinion can differ from a subsequent sale for many legitimate reasons, including changed conditions, atypical motivation, or a non-arm's-length transaction. Accuracy against hindsight is not the standard.
Option D: Acceptable to the client who ordered the work
Client acceptance is irrelevant to credibility, and a client who is pleased with a result has not validated the analysis, just as a displeased client has not invalidated it. Allowing client satisfaction to define credibility would put pressure directly on the value conclusion, which is what the ETHICS RULE guards against. The measure is evidence and logic against the intended use, not approval.
Believable For This Purpose
Credible is two words joined: believable, and for this purpose. Neither half works alone. Believable to whom and for what is the question the definition forces you to answer every time.
How to use: Whenever a stem uses credible, supply both halves of the definition and reject options built on peer certification, numerical tolerances, or client approval. Then connect it to scope of work, since the intended use sets how much evidence and logic is enough. If a scope will not clear the threshold, expand it or decline.
Exam Tip
Credible means worthy of belief, judged against the intended use. There is no accuracy percentage and no client-approval test.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Judging a past appraisal's credibility against a later sale price
- -Treating client satisfaction as evidence that results were credible
- -Applying a single fixed scope of work to every assignment regardless of intended use
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This item tests a defined term that organizes much of USPAP. Credible is defined as worthy of belief, and the comment accompanying the definition ties credibility to support by relevant evidence and logic, to the degree necessary for the intended use. Two consequences follow. First, credibility is a threshold rather than an accuracy score, so the question is never whether the number turned out to be right but whether the evidence and reasoning make it believable. Second, the threshold moves with the intended use, so what suffices for an internal portfolio screening may be far short of what a condemnation proceeding or a high-value lending decision requires. That relative standard is what links the definition to the SCOPE OF WORK RULE, which measures the required scope against what will produce credible assignment results for the intended use and against the expectations of parties who are regularly intended users for similar assignments.
Background Knowledge
You need to know the USPAP definition of credible as worthy of belief and the accompanying idea that credible assignment results require support by relevant evidence and logic to the degree necessary for the intended use. You should know how the definition operates inside the SCOPE OF WORK RULE, which measures required scope against credible results for the intended use and against peer expectations for similar assignments. You also need to know related defined terms that get confused with it, including assignment results, intended use, and intended user.
Real-World Application
Asked for a quick value indication to support an internal loan modification review, an appraiser confirms with the client that no third party will rely on it and develops a narrower scope than she would for new lending on the same property. She documents why the evidence assembled supports credible results for that specific intended use, and when the client later asks to repurpose the same report for a foreclosure sale, she explains that the intended use has changed and a new assignment is required.
More USPAP Questions
Which statement best defines a hypothetical condition under USPAP?
According to the Competency Rule, if an appraiser lacks the knowledge and experience to complete an assignment competently, which action is NOT acceptable?
An appraiser runs only the sales comparison approach on a standard tract home and omits the cost and income approaches. Under Standard 1 this is:
A value opinion for a subdivision as if fully built out two years from now is what kind of assignment, and what does it require?
A hypothetical condition differs from an extraordinary assumption in that a hypothetical condition:
An appraiser must disclose in the certification whether they have:
A client-imposed requirement — 'use only comps from our approved list' — is best described as:
Under Standard 1, when developing a real property appraisal, an appraiser must:
The certification required by Standards Rule 2-3 must be signed by:
According to Standard 1, when developing an opinion of market value, an appraiser must analyze:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam