Concessions such as free rent offered to new tenants should be treated in the income analysis as:
Correct Answer
D) A reduction in effective income over the lease term
Why this is correct: Concessions like free rent are not an addition to income or a one-time expense. They represent a discount on the contract rent, reducing the actual cash flow the property generates. The governing principle is that effective gross income must reflect the true economic rent. For example, three months free on a three-year lease means the annual effective rent is lower than the stated contract rent. This reduction must be recognized over the entire lease term for an accurate income analysis. Why the other choices are wrong: 'An addition to potential gross income' is wrong because concessions reduce, not increase, the income actually received. 'An operating expense in the year granted' is wrong because a concession is not a cash outflow for maintenance or taxes; it is a revenue reduction. 'A capital item that is excluded from the income analysis' is wrong because concessions directly affect operating income and are not a capital improvement. Exam tip: For income analysis, always adjust contract rent to effective rent by spreading any concession value over the lease term.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is right because a concession is a reduction in the effective income realized over the lease term. Recognizing it that way keeps the income statement honest: potential gross income reflects rent the space can actually command on the terms landlords are actually offering, and the resulting net operating income supports a capitalization that means something. The alternative treatments all misplace the concession in the statement and produce a value that assumes income the property does not generate. Consistency between the subject and the comparables is the discipline that makes it work.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: An addition to potential gross income
A concession reduces income; it cannot add to potential gross income. Potential gross income is what the property would produce at full occupancy at market rent, and free rent is a discount from that, not a supplement. The option inverts the sign of the item.
Option B: An operating expense in the year granted
An operating expense is a cash outlay to run the property - taxes, insurance, utilities, management, maintenance. Free rent is money never received rather than money paid out, and booking it as an expense in the year granted also concentrates in one period an effect that belongs across the whole term. It would additionally distort the operating expense ratio and any expense comparisons drawn from the market.
Option C: A capital item that is excluded from the income analysis
Excluding the concession as a capital item pretends the property earns its face rent, which is the very error the analysis is meant to prevent. Capital items are expenditures on the asset itself, such as a roof replacement or a building addition, not foregone revenue. Leaving it out overstates net operating income and, through capitalization, overstates value by a multiple of the error.
Spread the free months across the term
Free rent is not a gift and not an expense - it is a discount. Spread the free months across the whole term to get effective rent, and analyze the subject and the comparables the same way. Face rent is what the lease says; effective rent is what the landlord banks.
How to use: When a stem mentions free rent, tenant improvement allowances, or moving allowances, convert to effective rent before anything else. Then reject options that add the concession to income, expense it in one year, or exclude it as capital.
Exam Tip
Watch for a mismatch between the subject and the comparables; a question can be testing whether you noticed that a capitalization rate was extracted from face rents while the subject was analyzed on effective rents.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Building a projection on face rent when concessions are prevalent
- -Treating free rent as an operating expense
- -Concentrating the concession in the year granted rather than spreading it
- -Mixing face-rent comparables with an effective-rent subject analysis
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests how a rent concession is carried into an income analysis. A tenant given free months pays the stated contract rent on paper but less than that in substance, so the number in the lease overstates what the space actually generates. The convention is to spread the concession across the lease term to produce an effective rent - three months free on a thirty-six-month lease at five thousand a month means one hundred sixty-five thousand collected over three years, or about four thousand five hundred eighty a month effective rather than five thousand. Two things follow. First, the subject's income projection should be built on effective rent, not on face rent, or the projection will overstate every figure downstream. Second, and just as important, the comparables must be examined the same way: a market where landlords are quietly buying occupancy with free rent will show face rents that look healthy and effective rents that do not, and capitalization rates extracted from those sales will be distorted if the income was taken at face value.
Background Knowledge
You need the distinction between contract rent, market rent, and effective rent, the method of spreading a concession across the lease term, and the income statement sequence from potential gross income through effective gross income to net operating income. You should also know that tenant improvement allowances and other inducements are analyzed on the same logic, and that capitalization rates extracted from comparable sales must be built on income defined the same way as the subject's.
Real-World Application
An office landlord offering three months free on five-year leases is quoting thirty dollars a foot face. The appraiser computes effective rent of about twenty-eight fifty, uses that in the subject's projection, and checks whether the comparable sales from which she extracted her capitalization rate were similarly concessioned.
More Income Approach Questions
In a percentage lease, rent is commonly structured as:
In a DCF, what is the reversion?
Potential gross income differs from effective gross income in that PGI assumes:
The reversion in a discounted cash flow model represents:
Building A (new, credit tenant, 20-year lease) and Building B (older, month-to-month tenants) sell the same week. Their cap rates should differ how?
An overall rate extracted from a sale whose NOI excluded reserves, applied to a subject NOI that includes them, will:
Replacement reserves cover which kind of expenditure?
What is the primary distinction, for appraisal purposes, between 'vacancy loss' and 'collection loss'?
An appraiser is analyzing a mixed-use property with retail and office components. The retail segment has a potential gross income of $180,000 with a market vacancy of 8%. The office segment has a potential gross income of $120,000 with a market vacancy of 12%. What is the overall effective gross income for the property?
The mortgage constant represents:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam