Compensation contingent on a subsequent event, such as a loan closing, is:
Correct Answer
A) Prohibited for appraisal assignments
Why this is correct: USPAP's Ethics Rule prohibits an appraiser from accepting an assignment that includes a contingency fee based on a subsequent event, such as a loan closing or a specific value conclusion. Such compensation creates an incentive to bias the appraisal. Why the other choices are wrong: Written client consent does not make a prohibited contingency fee permissible. Disclosure in the certification does not cure the violation; the arrangement itself is barred. It is not required for federally related transactions; it is prohibited. Exam tip: Any compensation contingent on a deal closing or value outcome is strictly prohibited.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is right because compensation contingent on a subsequent event such as a loan closing is prohibited for appraisal assignments. The prohibition attaches to the arrangement itself, so the violation occurs when the engagement is accepted, regardless of whether the eventual opinion turns out to be well supported. The appraiser's fee must be earned by performing the assignment, not by the transaction succeeding. Note that this is a rule about the appraiser's arrangement; where a client's own payment practices create the same effect, the appraiser still cannot accept the engagement on those terms.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: Permitted with written client consent
Client consent cannot authorize what the standards prohibit, and the client is the party whose interest the prohibition guards against in the first place. Intended users and the public rely on an appraisal precisely because the appraiser has no stake in the outcome, and they are not parties to any consent the client gives. A written agreement documents the arrangement rather than legitimizing it.
Option C: Permitted when disclosed in the certification
Disclosure works where the standards require transparency about something permitted; it does nothing where the underlying arrangement is barred. Certifying that the fee depends on the loan closing would announce the violation to every reader while leaving the incentive fully in place. Some conflicts are managed by disclosure and this is not one of them.
Option D: Required for federally related transactions
The direction is exactly backwards. Federally related transactions are the setting in which appraiser independence is most heavily regulated, and contingent compensation is prohibited there as everywhere else. No transaction type requires an arrangement the ETHICS RULE forbids.
Paid for the work, never for the outcome
An appraiser is paid for the work, never for the outcome. If the invoice depends on a number, a direction, a stipulated result, or a deal closing, the arrangement is barred before the assignment begins. Consent and disclosure do not reach it.
How to use: Test any fee arrangement by asking whether anything other than completing the assignment determines whether the appraiser gets paid. If so, the answer is prohibited, and every option offering consent, disclosure, or a transaction-type exception is wrong.
Exam Tip
The prohibition covers acceptance as well as performance, so the correct answer is usually that the appraiser may not take the assignment at all rather than that she must manage the conflict.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Believing written consent can cure a contingent fee
- -Disclosing a contingency instead of refusing the arrangement
- -Overlooking that payment at closing is itself a contingency on a subsequent event
- -Assuming the prohibition applies only to fees tied to a specific value
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the contingent compensation prohibition in the Management section of the ETHICS RULE. The rule bars an appraiser from accepting an assignment, or having a compensation arrangement for an assignment, that is contingent on any of a specific list of outcomes: the reporting of a predetermined result, a direction in assignment results that favors the cause of the client, the amount of a value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the appraiser's opinions and specific to the assignment's purpose. A fee payable only if the loan closes falls in the last two categories at once. The reasoning is structural rather than suspicious: an appraiser paid only when the deal completes has a financial stake in the deal completing, and a low value opinion kills the transaction and the fee together. That is an incentive to bias, and the rule removes it by prohibiting the arrangement rather than by policing the resulting opinions.
Background Knowledge
You need the Management section of the ETHICS RULE and its list of prohibited contingencies - predetermined result, direction favoring the client's cause, amount of the value opinion, attainment of a stipulated result, and occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the appraiser's opinions and specific to the assignment's purpose. You should also know the Conduct section's requirements of impartiality, objectivity, and independence, and the advertising prohibition in the same Management section.
Real-World Application
A mortgage broker offers an appraiser a fee payable at closing rather than at delivery. The appraiser declines the terms, explains that her fee must be earned on delivery of the report regardless of what happens to the loan, and the broker either revises the engagement or takes the work elsewhere.
More USPAP Questions
Which statement best defines a hypothetical condition under USPAP?
According to the Competency Rule, if an appraiser lacks the knowledge and experience to complete an assignment competently, which action is NOT acceptable?
An appraiser runs only the sales comparison approach on a standard tract home and omits the cost and income approaches. Under Standard 1 this is:
A value opinion for a subdivision as if fully built out two years from now is what kind of assignment, and what does it require?
A hypothetical condition differs from an extraordinary assumption in that a hypothetical condition:
An appraiser must disclose in the certification whether they have:
A client-imposed requirement — 'use only comps from our approved list' — is best described as:
Under Standard 1, when developing a real property appraisal, an appraiser must:
The certification required by Standards Rule 2-3 must be signed by:
According to Standard 1, when developing an opinion of market value, an appraiser must analyze:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam