An extraordinary assumption must be:
Correct Answer
A) Clearly disclosed and its impact on value discussed
Why this is correct: The governing concept under USPAP is that an extraordinary assumption, which is an assumption that if found false could alter the appraiser's opinions or conclusions, must be clearly disclosed in the report. The appraiser must also discuss the assumption's impact on the assignment results and explain why it was necessary. Why the other choices are wrong: "Avoided whenever possible regardless of assignment conditions" is incorrect because extraordinary assumptions are sometimes necessary; the key is proper disclosure. "Reasonable and supported by market evidence" is incorrect because while assumptions should be reasonable, the primary requirement is disclosure and impact discussion, not necessarily market support. "Disclosed in the report but verification is optional" is incorrect because USPAP requires disclosure and discussion of impact, not merely disclosure without analysis. Exam tip: Always clearly disclose extraordinary assumptions and explain their impact on value.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
USPAP Standards Rule 1-4(f) explicitly requires that extraordinary assumptions be clearly and conspicuously disclosed in the report. The appraiser must not only identify the assumption but also analyze and explain how it impacts the assignment results and final value conclusion. Additionally, the appraiser must explain why the extraordinary assumption is necessary for the assignment. This transparency ensures that users of the report understand the conditional nature of the conclusions.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
DID Method for Extraordinary Assumptions
DID = Disclose clearly, Impact analysis, Discuss necessity. Remember: You DID make an assumption, so you must DID the requirements.
How to use: When you see questions about extraordinary assumptions, think DID - the answer should include clear disclosure, impact analysis, and discussion of necessity, not just one element.
Exam Tip
Look for answers that include both disclosure AND impact analysis - partial compliance answers are typically incorrect on USPAP questions.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Thinking disclosure alone is sufficient without impact analysis
- -Confusing extraordinary assumptions with hypothetical conditions
- -Believing extraordinary assumptions must be supported by market evidence
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
An extraordinary assumption is a supposition regarding uncertain information used in an assignment that, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser's opinions or conclusions. USPAP Standards Rule 1-4(f) specifically addresses extraordinary assumptions and requires strict disclosure and impact analysis. These assumptions are used when key information is uncertain or unavailable, but the assignment must proceed. The appraiser cannot simply make assumptions without proper disclosure and analysis of how these assumptions affect the final value conclusion.
Background Knowledge
USPAP Standards Rule 1-4(f) governs the use of extraordinary assumptions in appraisal assignments. Appraisers must understand the difference between extraordinary assumptions (uncertain information) and hypothetical conditions (contrary-to-fact scenarios).
Real-World Application
When appraising a property with potential environmental contamination but no recent environmental report, an appraiser might use an extraordinary assumption that the property is not contaminated, but must clearly disclose this assumption and explain how a different environmental condition would affect the value conclusion.
More USPAP Questions
Which statement best defines a hypothetical condition under USPAP?
According to the Competency Rule, if an appraiser lacks the knowledge and experience to complete an assignment competently, which action is NOT acceptable?
An appraiser runs only the sales comparison approach on a standard tract home and omits the cost and income approaches. Under Standard 1 this is:
A value opinion for a subdivision as if fully built out two years from now is what kind of assignment, and what does it require?
A hypothetical condition differs from an extraordinary assumption in that a hypothetical condition:
An appraiser must disclose in the certification whether they have:
A client-imposed requirement — 'use only comps from our approved list' — is best described as:
Under Standard 1, when developing a real property appraisal, an appraiser must:
The certification required by Standards Rule 2-3 must be signed by:
According to Standard 1, when developing an opinion of market value, an appraiser must analyze:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Related Tools
Previous Question
According to Standard 1, when developing a real property appraisal, an appraiser must analyze the effect on value of which of the following?
Next Question
An appraiser discovers mid-assignment that the property has a complex ground lease she does not know how to analyze. What does USPAP require?
