EstatePass
reconciliationhard

An assignment requires valuing a property as though a proposed rezoning had been granted. What is required for this to be acceptable?

Correct Answer

C) Its use must be disclosed and results still credible

Why this is correct: This is a hypothetical condition (assuming a fact contrary to what is known). USPAP permits its use if it is: 1) required for a legitimate purpose, 2) disclosed clearly, and 3) the resulting appraisal is still credible for the intended use. Why the other choices are wrong: The rezoning need not be certain; certainty would make it a fact, not a hypothetical. Client indemnification does not make the appraisal credible or compliant. A second opinion under existing zoning is not mandatory. Exam tip: For a hypothetical condition, focus on disclosure, legitimate purpose, and credibility of the result.

Answer Options
A
The rezoning must be certain to be approved
B
The client must indemnify the appraiser in writing
C
Its use must be disclosed and results still credible
D
A second opinion under existing zoning is mandatory

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Why this is correct: This is a hypothetical condition (assuming a fact contrary to what is known). USPAP permits its use if it is: 1) required for a legitimate purpose, 2) disclosed clearly, and 3) the resulting appraisal is still credible for the intended use. Why the other choices are wrong: The rezoning need not be certain; certainty would make it a fact, not a hypothetical. Client indemnification does not make the appraisal credible or compliant. A second opinion under existing zoning is not mandatory. Exam tip: For a hypothetical condition, focus on disclosure, legitimate purpose, and credibility of the result.

Was this explanation helpful?

More reconciliation Questions

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing