An appraiser values a proposed building as though complete on the effective date, when construction has not started. What is this?
Correct Answer
B) A hypothetical condition about the property
Why this is correct: A hypothetical condition is an assumption that is contrary to what is known to be true on the effective date. Valuing a proposed building as complete when construction has not started assumes a condition contrary to fact. Why the other choices are wrong: An extraordinary assumption is about an uncertain fact (e.g., 'subject to a satisfactory inspection'). This is not a limiting condition on scope. It is not a jurisdictional exception. Exam tip: Hypothetical = contrary to known fact. Extraordinary assumption = uncertain fact.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is right because the stem fixes the effective date as of now, when no construction has started. Treating the building as finished on that date supposes something contrary to what is known to exist, which is exactly what a hypothetical condition is. Its use is permitted when it is reasonable for the assignment, produces credible results, and is disclosed clearly, along with a statement that its use might have affected the assignment results.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: An extraordinary assumption about the market
An extraordinary assumption deals with information that is uncertain rather than known to be false, such as an unverified lot size or an assumed absence of contamination. Whether the building exists on the effective date is not uncertain; the stem says construction has not started. The choice also points the assumption at the market rather than at the physical property, which does not match the facts.
Option C: A limiting condition on the scope of work
Limiting conditions define the boundaries of the appraiser's responsibility and describe the scope of work; they cannot create a factual premise contrary to what the appraiser knows. Burying the completion premise among boilerplate would hide a fact that materially changes the meaning of the value opinion. Scope limits and contrary-to-fact premises are different instruments.
Option D: A jurisdictional exception to Standard 1
A jurisdictional exception operates only when a law or regulation applicable to the assignment voids part of USPAP, and it requires the appraiser to cite the law and identify the voided portion. No statute is in play here, and valuing proposed construction is a routine assignment type rather than a legal override. The option confuses a rare legal mechanism with an ordinary analytical device.
Check the Calendar First
Before labeling anything, find the effective date. Building not there on that date but valued as finished equals hypothetical condition. Effective date moved out to completion equals prospective value opinion.
How to use: Underline the effective date in the stem, then ask whether the premise contradicts what exists on that exact day. Only a contradiction produces a hypothetical condition.
Exam Tip
Proposed construction items hinge on one date. If the stem never moves the effective date forward, the answer is a hypothetical condition, not a forecast.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Labeling a proposed-construction premise an extraordinary assumption
- -Failing to state that use of the hypothetical condition might have affected the results
- -Omitting the as-is value when the assignment or the client's use calls for it
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
Valuing proposed improvements forces a choice between two devices, and the effective date decides which one applies. If the effective date is today and the building does not exist today, then supposing it complete contradicts a fact the appraiser knows, which is a hypothetical condition. If instead the appraiser sets a prospective effective date after the anticipated completion, the opinion is a prospective value opinion resting on forecasts rather than on a contrary-to-fact premise. Both are permitted, and both must be disclosed, but they are labeled differently and carry different disclosure language. Assignments involving proposed construction commonly also require analysis of the feasibility of completion and the market conditions expected to exist.
Background Knowledge
You need the definitions of hypothetical condition and extraordinary assumption and the disclosure duties that follow from each. You also need to know that a prospective value opinion uses an effective date in the future, which is the alternative device when the client wants a value as of completion.
Real-World Application
A lender ordering a construction loan appraisal wants the as-completed value; the appraiser reports the as-is land value with a current effective date and the as-completed value either under a clearly disclosed hypothetical condition or as a prospective opinion with a future effective date, depending on the client's need.
More USPAP Questions
Reconciliation of the approaches to value is best described as which activity?
Why should the reconciliation address the quantity of evidence as well as its quality?
How long must a report be retained compared with the workfile?
What distinguishes an appraisal review from an appraisal?
An appraiser reconciles to a value at the top of the indicated range because the client needs that figure. What has occurred?
What does it mean that a value opinion must be reasonable rather than merely arithmetically derived?
What should the reconciliation section explain to the reader?
How do the content obligations of the two report options differ with respect to the information analyzed?
The three approaches indicate $480,000, $495,000 and $610,000. What should the appraiser do first?
Three approaches indicate $1.02 million, $1.05 million and $1.04 million. How should this be reported?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam