Local validation shows an AVM systematically overstates values in a neighborhood, and no supported correction has been established. How should the appraiser treat its current output there?
Correct Answer
C) Do not rely on it; investigate and validate any correction first
Known systematic error undermines reliance on the affected output. Investigate its causes and use other supported evidence until an adequate correction is developed and validated. Calibration may require changes in data, specification, or application; an arbitrary discount and a disclaimer do not establish reliability. More observations alone do not necessarily eliminate bias or guarantee lower uncertainty when errors are correlated or data are unsuitable.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option C is correct because known systematic error undermines reliance on the affected output, so the appraiser should not rely on it in that neighborhood. Any correction must be investigated and validated before use. In the meantime, the appraiser relies on other supported evidence to reach credible results.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Apply an arbitrary flat discount to the output without any testing
Option A is wrong because an arbitrary flat discount applied without any testing is not a supported correction. Calibration may require changes in data, specification or application, and an untested discount does not establish reliability.
Option B: Adopt the number with a warning instead of investigating the bias
Option B is wrong because adopting the number with a warning instead of investigating the bias leaves the unreliable figure in place. A disclaimer discloses a problem but does not make biased output credible.
Option D: Assume the error will cancel itself out in the current assignment
Option D is wrong because assuming the error will cancel itself out ignores that the bias is systematic, meaning it runs consistently in one direction. A one-directional overstatement does not offset itself in a single assignment.
Biased model, benched model
When testing shows a model leans one way, take it off the field until a tested correction puts it back. A warning label or a guessed discount does not fix the lean.
How to use: Use this when a question describes known AVM bias and offers quick fixes like disclaimers or flat discounts.
Exam Tip
Choices that offer a disclaimer, an untested discount, or hope that errors cancel are shortcuts; the supported answer is to stop relying on the output and validate any correction.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Applying a round-number discount to biased output without testing it
- -Believing a disclosure makes an unreliable figure acceptable
- -Assuming more data points automatically remove systematic bias
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests how an appraiser responds to a known, systematic bias in an AVM. Once local validation shows the model overstates values and no supported correction exists, its output there cannot be relied upon. The reasoning path is to stop relying on it, investigate the cause, and use other supported evidence until a correction is developed and validated.
Background Knowledge
AVMs and other analytical tools need validation to show they produce reliable estimates in the market where they are used. Systematic bias is a consistent error in one direction, and more observations alone do not necessarily remove it when errors are correlated or the data are unsuitable.
Real-World Application
A lender's review of AVM results finds the model runs consistently high in an older neighborhood with many unrenovated homes. The appraiser sets the AVM aside for that area, relies on verified comparable sales, and leaves model recalibration to those who can test it.
More Emerging Methods Questions
A loan is eligible for Fannie Mae's value acceptance + property data option, and the lender elects that option. What does the lender obtain in place of an appraisal?
An appraiser uses a building-permit file to investigate an addition. What is an important limitation of that source?
A real estate salesperson, acting solely in a brokerage role, prepares a CMA to help a listing client choose an asking price. Which statement is best?
An appropriately credentialed appraiser is offered a desktop assignment on an unfamiliar property type. A necessary competency gap is known before agreement. If the appraiser elects to proceed, what is required?
How should an appraiser identify potentially distressed transactions in a data set?
Why should an appraiser identify the data sources used in the report?
How should an appraiser treat a value estimate found on a consumer real estate website?
An appraiser builds a spreadsheet regression to support adjustments. How is it treated?
May an appraiser use data from a prior assignment for a different client?
The intended lender’s applicable assignment conditions require an interior inspection. The client asks the appraiser to deliver a desktop appraisal instead, and the inspection condition has not been authorized for modification. What should the appraiser do?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Previous Question
A bank uses an AVM backed by the vendor's value insurance, and the vendor supplies its own validation statistics. Under Appendix B of the Interagency Guidelines, what should the bank do about validation?
Next Question
A property data collection reveals damage the collector describes but does not evaluate. What follows for the appraiser?