Collector photographs show cracking that may be structural, and the appraiser cannot assess its significance from the available information. What is the appropriate response?
Correct Answer
B) Get adequate specialist input or a permitted scope; never deliver noncredible results
Identify the material uncertainty and obtain the information or qualified assistance needed for credible results. A permissible extraordinary assumption requires a reasonable basis and satisfaction of the applicable development and reporting conditions; disclosure alone is not permission to guess. Known facts cannot be contradicted under an extraordinary assumption. If the issue cannot be addressed credibly within permitted conditions, the assignment cannot be completed as requested.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because the appraiser should obtain adequate specialist input or use a permitted scope, and must not deliver results that are not credible. USPAP requires the appraiser to expand the scope to gather the information, use an extraordinary assumption only if credible results can still be developed and its conditions are met, or withdraw. If the issue cannot be addressed credibly, the assignment cannot be completed as requested.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Assume structural soundness, solely because the assumption will be disclosed
Option A is wrong because it assumes structural soundness simply because the assumption will be disclosed. An extraordinary assumption requires a reasonable basis and must meet the applicable conditions; disclosure alone is not permission to guess.
Option C: Deduct a customary percentage for the cracking without any market evidence
Option C is wrong because it deducts a customary percentage for the cracking without any market evidence. An unsupported deduction does not resolve whether the cracking is structural or what it means for value.
Option D: Omit the issue, because the appraiser did not personally take the collector’s photographs
Option D is wrong because it omits the issue on the ground that the appraiser did not take the photographs. The photos are evidence of a possible problem, and known information cannot be ignored because someone else gathered it.
Gather, assume properly, or withdraw
Facing a material unknown, you have three paths: get the information, use a properly supported extraordinary assumption, or step away. Guessing with a disclosure is not one of them.
How to use: Use this when a question describes a significant condition the appraiser cannot evaluate from available data.
Exam Tip
An extraordinary assumption needs a reasonable basis and credible results; choices that rely on disclosure alone or customary deductions do not meet that test.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Believing that disclosing an assumption makes any assumption acceptable
- -Applying a rule-of-thumb deduction for a defect without market support
- -Ignoring third-party photos of a defect because the appraiser did not take them
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the response to a material uncertainty the appraiser cannot resolve from available information. USPAP calls for gathering the needed information, using a permissible extraordinary assumption only when its conditions are met, or withdrawing. Disclosing a guess, applying an unsupported deduction, or omitting the issue does not produce credible results.
Background Knowledge
When relevant information is unavailable due to assignment conditions, USPAP requires the appraiser to expand the scope, use a supportable extraordinary assumption, or withdraw. An extraordinary assumption may be used only if it is required for credible results and the appraiser has a reasonable basis for it, among other conditions.
Real-World Application
In a hybrid assignment, the collector's photos show a diagonal crack across a foundation wall. The appraiser asks the client to obtain a structural engineer's report before completing the appraisal, rather than assuming the crack is cosmetic.
More Emerging Methods Questions
A loan is eligible for Fannie Mae's value acceptance + property data option, and the lender elects that option. What does the lender obtain in place of an appraisal?
An appraiser uses a building-permit file to investigate an addition. What is an important limitation of that source?
A real estate salesperson, acting solely in a brokerage role, prepares a CMA to help a listing client choose an asking price. Which statement is best?
An appropriately credentialed appraiser is offered a desktop assignment on an unfamiliar property type. A necessary competency gap is known before agreement. If the appraiser elects to proceed, what is required?
How should an appraiser identify potentially distressed transactions in a data set?
Why should an appraiser identify the data sources used in the report?
How should an appraiser treat a value estimate found on a consumer real estate website?
An appraiser builds a spreadsheet regression to support adjustments. How is it treated?
May an appraiser use data from a prior assignment for a different client?
The intended lender’s applicable assignment conditions require an interior inspection. The client asks the appraiser to deliver a desktop appraisal instead, and the inspection condition has not been authorized for modification. What should the appraiser do?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Previous Question
An appraiser receives a collector’s area sketch, while comparable-sale area figures may use different measurement conventions. What should the appraiser do before relying on the figures?
Next Question
A bank develops an evaluation for an exempt home-equity loan using an AVM whose estimate assumes the house is in average condition. No inspection was performed and nothing else documents the property's condition. Under the Interagency Guidelines, is this evaluation acceptable?