An appraiser has listed five candidate uses for a vacant site. Which sequence of analysis follows the highest and best use criteria?
Correct Answer
B) Drop uses that are not legal or not physically possible, test the rest for feasibility, then pick the most productive
The criteria work as successive screens: uses that are not legally permissible or physically possible are eliminated first, the remaining uses are tested for financial feasibility, and the most productive of the feasible uses is the highest and best use. Ranking by land value first or running feasibility studies first wastes effort on uses that could never be built, and choosing by demand alone skips the legal test and the comparison of land values.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because it applies the tests as a funnel: legal and physical screens remove uses that cannot be built, feasibility testing keeps uses with a positive return, and the most productive feasible use is selected. The maximally productive test is defined as a choice among the financially feasible uses, so it has to come last.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Rank all five by projected land value, then check whether the top-ranked use is legal and buildable
Option A ranks all five uses by projected land value before checking legality and buildability. Land value is compared among feasible uses only after illegal and physically impossible uses have been removed, so ranking first puts the last test at the front.
Option C: Test all five for financial feasibility, then drop the feasible uses that zoning or the site would not allow
Option C runs feasibility studies on all five uses and only afterward drops those that zoning or the site would not allow. Feasibility analysis of a use that cannot legally or physically be built is wasted work, and the order reverses the screening sequence.
Option D: Select the use with the strongest market demand, then confirm that it fits the site physically
Option D selects a use by market demand and then checks only physical fit. Demand is one part of feasibility, but this approach skips the legal test and never compares land values among the feasible uses.
Legal, physical, feasible, maximal funnel
Picture a funnel: the wide top removes what the law and the site will not allow, the middle keeps what pays, and the narrow bottom keeps the use that produces the most land value.
How to use: Use the funnel picture whenever a question asks which test comes first or which uses are compared in the final step.
Exam Tip
When an option ranks uses by value before the legal and physical screens, it has the order backward. The maximally productive test compares only uses that already passed feasibility.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Comparing land values for uses that zoning does not allow
- -Running feasibility studies before confirming the site can physically hold the use
- -Choosing the use with the most demand without comparing land values
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the order in which the four highest and best use tests are applied. Legal and physical tests narrow the field of possible uses, financial feasibility then identifies uses that produce a positive return, and the maximally productive test selects among the feasible survivors. The answer is the option that keeps that funnel order.
Background Knowledge
Highest and best use must be legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible and maximally productive. The first two tests are screens, the third identifies uses that produce a positive return, and the fourth picks the feasible use that produces the highest land value on a risk-adjusted basis.
Real-World Application
A builder asks an appraiser to evaluate a corner lot for a single-family home, two homes on a lot split, a duplex, a fourplex and a row of townhouses. Zoning excludes the fourplex and the lot is too small for the townhouses, so only three uses go on to feasibility testing, and the appraiser then compares their residual land values.
More Market Questions
In market area analysis, what characteristic distinguishes a district from a neighborhood?
Under USPAP Standards Rule 1-3(a), which item must an appraiser identify and analyze when necessary for credible results in a market value assignment?
How does the Fannie Mae Selling Guide define a neighborhood?
Several homes in a neighborhood are vacant and boarded up. Which market force does Fannie Mae classify this as?
Infrastructure investment such as a new interchange typically affects nearby land by:
A city raises property tax rates and tightens building regulations. Which market force does Fannie Mae classify these as?
An appraiser believes, without market evidence, that a nearby group home lowers values. What does Fannie Mae require?
Which three categories are used to report the supply of properties in a Fannie Mae neighborhood section?
An appraiser is asked for a retrospective value opinion as of three years ago. When must the appraiser meet the Competency Rule?
Can mixed land uses in a residential neighborhood ever enhance home values, according to Fannie Mae?
People Also Study
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
Using the same sale-price/original-list-price definition and comparable samples, a segment’s average sale-to-list ratio rises from 96% to 100%. What limited interpretation is most supportable?
Next Question
Other relevant conditions held equal, which combination most directly combines stronger effective residential demand with relatively constrained current inventory?