An appraiser discovers that a comparable sale occurred between related parties at a below-market price. According to USPAP, the appraiser should:
Correct Answer
D) Reject the sale as not arm's length and seek other comparables
Why this is correct: USPAP Standards require that comparable sales be arm's-length transactions reflecting market value. A sale between related parties (e.g., family members) at a below-market price is not arm's length and does not represent market value. It should generally be rejected, and the appraiser should seek other comparables. Why the other choices are wrong: "Average the sale price with other comparables to minimize the impact" would incorporate non-market data, compromising credibility. "Use the sale without adjustment since it's a market transaction" is incorrect; it is not a market transaction. "Use the sale but make an upward adjustment for the relationship" is unreliable because the adjustment amount is speculative and the sale may be too distorted. Exam tip: When in doubt about a comparable's arm's-length status, exclude it and find a better sale.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
USPAP requires that comparable sales reflect market value, which necessitates arm's length transactions between unrelated parties. Related party sales at below-market prices indicate non-market motivations and should be rejected as they don't represent what typical buyers and sellers would agree upon. The appraiser's duty is to find comparables that accurately reflect market conditions, not to attempt adjustments that cannot reliably correct for non-market motivations. Seeking other arm's length comparables ensures the appraisal reflects true market value.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
ARM's Length = REJECT Related
ARM'S LENGTH CHECK: Always Reject Motivations that aren't Strictly LENGTH (market-based). If parties are related, LENGTH is compromised - reject and find new comparables.
How to use: When you see 'related parties' or 'below-market' in a question about comparables, immediately think 'ARM'S LENGTH CHECK' and remember that related = reject, then seek new comparables.
Exam Tip
Look for key phrases like 'related parties,' 'family members,' 'business partners,' or 'below-market price' - these are red flags that indicate non-arm's length transactions that should be rejected as comparables.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Attempting to adjust related party sales instead of rejecting them
- -Assuming all recorded sales are automatically arm's length transactions
- -Using related party sales when other comparables are available
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests understanding of USPAP's requirements for comparable sales and the arm's length transaction principle. Under USPAP, appraisers must use sales that reflect market value, which requires transactions between unrelated parties acting in their own best interests. Related party transactions often involve motivations other than market considerations, such as family relationships, business partnerships, or other non-market factors. When a sale occurs between related parties at below-market prices, it indicates the transaction was not conducted under typical market conditions and therefore doesn't represent what an unrelated buyer would pay.
Background Knowledge
USPAP requires that comparable sales be arm's length transactions that reflect market value, meaning they must occur between unrelated parties acting in their own best interests without duress or special motivations. Related party transactions often involve considerations other than market value, such as family relationships, business partnerships, or tax strategies.
Real-World Application
In practice, appraisers often encounter sales between family members, business entities with common ownership, or distressed situations where relationships affect pricing. These must be identified through research and rejected in favor of true market transactions between unrelated parties.
More USPAP Questions
Which statement best defines a hypothetical condition under USPAP?
According to the Competency Rule, if an appraiser lacks the knowledge and experience to complete an assignment competently, which action is NOT acceptable?
An appraiser runs only the sales comparison approach on a standard tract home and omits the cost and income approaches. Under Standard 1 this is:
A value opinion for a subdivision as if fully built out two years from now is what kind of assignment, and what does it require?
A hypothetical condition differs from an extraordinary assumption in that a hypothetical condition:
An appraiser must disclose in the certification whether they have:
A client-imposed requirement — 'use only comps from our approved list' — is best described as:
Under Standard 1, when developing a real property appraisal, an appraiser must:
The certification required by Standards Rule 2-3 must be signed by:
According to Standard 1, when developing an opinion of market value, an appraiser must analyze:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Related Tools
Previous Question
An appraiser assumes that a property has 10,000 square feet when it actually has 9,500 square feet, and this assumption is necessary for the analysis. This is an example of:
Next Question
Under the Scope of Work Rule, what must an appraiser do if the scope of work is insufficient to produce credible assignment results?