An appraiser delivers an oral report of value over the phone. What does USPAP say?
Correct Answer
D) Oral reports are permitted — with the same development duties and a compliant workfile
Why this is correct: USPAP permits oral reports, but the appraiser must fully comply with Standard 1 (development) and maintain a workfile documenting the report's substance, as explained originally. Why the other choices are wrong: "Oral reports are strictly prohibited for any real property appraisal assignment" is false; they are allowed. "Oral reports escape the standards entirely" is incorrect; USPAP applies. "Only litigation testimony may be oral" is wrong; oral reports are not limited to litigation. Exam tip: An oral report requires the same rigorous development and workfile as a written report.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Oral reports are permitted, and they carry the same development duties as written ones along with a workfile requirement. The development standard attaches to the act of appraising rather than to how the result is communicated. The workfile must include a summary of the substance communicated orally, which is what makes the report reconstructable later. Testimony given in a deposition or at trial is itself a form of oral report and is treated the same way.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Oral reports are strictly prohibited for any real property appraisal assignment
No prohibition on oral reports exists, and forbidding them would make expert testimony impossible, since testimony communicates assignment results aloud. The permission is longstanding and explicit. The word strictly signals an absolute the standards do not impose.
Option B: Oral reports escape the standards entirely
Nothing escapes the standards by being spoken. The obligations to develop credibly, to avoid misleading communication, and to keep a workfile all attach regardless of medium. Believing otherwise would create an obvious loophole that would swallow the reporting standards entirely.
Option C: Only litigation testimony may be oral
Litigation testimony is one common setting for oral reports but not the only permitted one. An appraiser may deliver an oral report in a consulting context or as a preliminary communication, subject to the same duties. Restricting the permission to litigation invents a limitation.
Spoken Is Still Reported
Development attaches to the appraising, not to the paper. Say the number out loud and every obligation still applies, plus one more: write down what you said and keep it.
How to use: When a stem describes an oral, verbal, or telephone communication of value, choose the answer that keeps the development duties intact and adds a workfile requirement. Reject prohibitions, exemptions, and litigation-only limits.
Exam Tip
Expert testimony counts as an oral report. Appraisers who testify must have developed the opinion to standard and must retain a record of the substance of their testimony.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Treating an oral value opinion as informal and skipping development steps
- -Failing to place a summary of the oral report in the workfile
- -Forgetting that expert testimony is itself an oral report
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
USPAP separates development from reporting, and the form of the report does not relax the development obligations. An appraiser delivering an opinion of value orally has still performed an appraisal, which means the entire development standard applies: problem identification, an appropriate scope of work, analysis of the relevant approaches, and a credible conclusion. What changes is only the communication medium. Oral reports carry their own reporting expectations, addressed to the extent recollection and the workfile permit, and the Record Keeping Rule requires a workfile containing a true copy of any written report or, for an oral report, a summary of the substance of what was communicated. The workfile must also hold the data, information, and analyses supporting the opinion, in sufficient detail for another appraiser to understand the work. Oral reports appear in expert testimony, in quick consultations, and in some litigation contexts, and the practical risk is that appraisers treat them casually and end up with no defensible record of what was said.
Background Knowledge
You need the separation between development and reporting standards, the two written report options, and the treatment of oral reports including expert testimony. You should also know the Record Keeping Rule's requirement for a workfile containing a summary of any oral report and supporting data and analyses sufficient for another appraiser to understand the work.
Real-World Application
An appraiser asked for a quick value over the phone completes the full development process first, delivers the opinion orally, and immediately writes a memorandum to her workfile recording the date, the client, the intended use, the value, the effective date, and the substance of what she communicated.
More USPAP Questions
Which statement best defines a hypothetical condition under USPAP?
According to the Competency Rule, if an appraiser lacks the knowledge and experience to complete an assignment competently, which action is NOT acceptable?
An appraiser runs only the sales comparison approach on a standard tract home and omits the cost and income approaches. Under Standard 1 this is:
A value opinion for a subdivision as if fully built out two years from now is what kind of assignment, and what does it require?
A hypothetical condition differs from an extraordinary assumption in that a hypothetical condition:
An appraiser must disclose in the certification whether they have:
A client-imposed requirement — 'use only comps from our approved list' — is best described as:
Under Standard 1, when developing a real property appraisal, an appraiser must:
The certification required by Standards Rule 2-3 must be signed by:
According to Standard 1, when developing an opinion of market value, an appraiser must analyze:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam