An appraiser assigns a 15-year effective age to a 15-year-old home in average condition. This suggests:
Correct Answer
A) The home has aged at a typical rate for its market
Why this is correct: When a home's effective age equals its actual age, it indicates the property has experienced normal wear and maintenance typical for its market, aging at the expected rate. Why the other choices are wrong: The home has been extensively renovated is wrong; that would typically reduce effective age below actual age. The home has been badly neglected is wrong; neglect would increase effective age above actual age. The appraiser has made a computational error somewhere is wrong; matching ages is a plausible and common scenario. Exam tip: Effective age reflects condition; actual age reflects time. They often differ.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because equal effective and actual ages mean the property has aged at a typical rate for its market, which is exactly what average condition conveys. The appraiser has judged that neither extra maintenance nor neglect has shifted the property off the normal curve. That is a substantive conclusion supported by observation, not a default. It will produce a depreciation ratio equal to actual age divided by total economic life.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: The home has been extensively renovated
Extensive renovation typically lowers effective age below actual age, because updated systems, finishes, and components make the property present and perform as though newer. A fifteen-year-old home effectively aged at fifteen shows no evidence of such work. The stem's description of average condition also points away from significant updating.
Option C: The home has been badly neglected
Neglect raises effective age above actual age, since deferred maintenance and worn components make a property present as older than its years. Effective age exceeding actual age is common on poorly maintained properties and is a useful signal in the cost approach. Equal ages indicate the opposite of neglect.
Option D: The appraiser has made a computational error somewhere
There is no computation to err in; effective age is a judgment about condition rather than a derived figure. Equality between the two is a frequent and unremarkable outcome, arguably the most common one for a property in average condition. Treating a coincidence of two numbers as evidence of error misunderstands what effective age is.
The Age It Looks
Actual age is the age it is; effective age is the age it looks. Renovate and it looks younger, neglect it and it looks older, leave it average and the two match. Matching is the normal case, not a mistake.
How to use: Translate the condition description into a direction. Above average or renovated pushes effective age down, below average or deferred maintenance pushes it up, average leaves it equal. Then check the option matches that direction rather than assuming divergence is always expected.
Exam Tip
Support your effective age with observed condition and specific updates in the report; an effective age asserted with no reasoning is one of the easiest findings for a reviewer to challenge.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Assuming effective age must always differ from actual age
- -Assigning effective age from the calendar without observing condition and updates
- -Failing to explain in the report what observations supported the effective age judgment
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the relationship between actual age and effective age. Actual age, sometimes called chronological or historical age, is simply the number of years since construction and is a matter of record. Effective age is an appraiser's judgment about the age the improvements appear to be based on their condition, utility, quality of maintenance, and the market's perception, and it is what drives the depreciation calculation in the age-life method. The two diverge whenever a property has been maintained better or worse than typical or has been updated: substantial renovation pushes effective age below actual age, while deferred maintenance and dated systems push it above. When the appraiser assigns an effective age equal to the actual age, the judgment being expressed is that the property has worn and been maintained about as the market expects for a building of that vintage, which is precisely what average condition describes. This is an entirely ordinary conclusion, not a sign of carelessness. It is worth remembering that effective age is also market-relative, since a house judged average in one neighborhood might be judged dated in another where renovation is the norm.
Background Knowledge
You need to know the definitions of actual age, effective age, total economic life, and remaining economic life, and how they combine in the age-life depreciation ratio. You should also know that effective age is a market-relative judgment about condition and utility, that renovation lowers it while deferred maintenance raises it, and that the ratio applies to cost new to estimate accrued depreciation.
Real-World Application
Appraising a fifteen-year-old home with original but well-kept systems, no updates, and no deferred maintenance, an appraiser assigns an effective age of fifteen against a sixty-year total economic life, producing a 25 percent depreciation ratio, and documents the condition observations supporting the judgment.
More Cost Approach Questions
In a cost approach for a proposed building, the appropriate cost basis is generally:
A warehouse cost $210,000 to build when the cost index stood at 105. The index is now 210. Its indicated current cost is:
The age-life method expresses depreciation as:
Market extraction of depreciation is limited by the fact that it:
Functional obsolescence caused by a deficiency is measured as curable when:
Curable physical deterioration is measured at cost to cure because:
A 2,050 sq ft dwelling is priced at $178 per square foot with a $34,000 detached garage and $21,500 of site improvements. Cost new is:
A house has three bedrooms sharing one bathroom, and adding a second bath is economically justified. This is:
Direct costs in a construction budget include:
An appraiser writes that a 40-year-old house has an effective age of 10 but describes original wiring, original kitchen and a 25-year-old roof. The report's problem is:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
A five-bedroom house has only one bathroom. Adding a second costs $28,000 now, would have cost $17,000 during construction, and the market pays $31,000 for the second bath. The functional obsolescence is:
Next Question
A 40-year-old house was gut-renovated five years ago: new systems, kitchen, baths, roof. Its effective age is best estimated at: