A 40-year-old house had major verified systems and interior renovation 5 years ago. How should effective age be estimated?
Correct Answer
D) From its current condition and utility compared with relevant properties.
Evaluate current condition and utility against relevant improvements after renovation. A substantial renovation can reduce effective age, but neither subtracting calendar dates nor automatically assigning zero is justified. Underlying age alone does not prevent a very low supported effective age.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because effective age is the age indicated by the condition and utility of the property on the valuation date. After a major verified renovation, the appraiser compares the house's current condition and utility with relevant properties to estimate how far along its economic life it effectively is. This is a judgment based on evidence, not on construction or renovation dates.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Set it at 40, the actual age, because the construction date does not change.
Option A says to set effective age at 40, the actual age, because the construction date does not change. That confuses actual age with effective age; a major renovation can make the house effectively younger than its 40 calendar years.
Option B: Zero, since the building has been renovated.
Option B says effective age is zero because the building was renovated. A renovation can reduce effective age, but assigning zero automatically is not justified; the figure must come from the house's actual condition and utility compared with relevant properties.
Option C: Exactly 35 years, found by subtracting the 5 years since renovation from 40.
Option C says effective age is exactly 35 years, found by subtracting the 5 years since renovation from 40. Subtracting calendar dates is a mechanical rule with no link to the house's condition and utility, so it does not produce a supported effective age.
Effective age reads condition
Think of effective age as the age the house looks and works like, not the age on its birth certificate. Calendars give actual age; condition and utility give effective age.
How to use: Use this when a question offers a date-based subtraction as the effective age of a renovated or neglected building.
Exam Tip
When a choice turns effective age into simple date arithmetic or a fixed number like zero, compare it with a choice based on condition and utility, which matches the definition.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Using actual age as effective age after a major renovation
- -Subtracting years since renovation from actual age as a formula
- -Treating any renovation as resetting effective age to zero
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the difference between actual (chronological) age and effective age after a renovation. Effective age is the age indicated by the property's condition and utility, so the appraiser must judge the renovated house against relevant properties rather than apply a calendar formula. A substantial renovation can lower effective age, but by an amount the evidence supports.
Background Knowledge
Actual age is the number of years since construction, while effective age reflects the stage of economic life indicated by condition and utility. Renovation, good maintenance or neglect can make effective age lower or higher than actual age. Effective age feeds directly into age-life depreciation estimates.
Real-World Application
An appraiser inspects a 1980s ranch house that received a new HVAC system, wiring, plumbing, kitchen and baths five years ago. Comparing it with nearby renovated and unrenovated homes, the appraiser concludes its condition and utility resemble a much newer house and explains the supported effective age in the cost approach.
More Cost Approach Questions
Why can equivalent-utility replacement cost be useful for an obsolete improvement?
An appraiser estimates the current replacement cost new of the improvements at $890,000, accrued depreciation from all causes at $170,000, and land value at $325,000. All necessary cost components and depreciation are included in those amounts. What is the indicated property value?
Improvement cost new is $595,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $48,000, $27,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. Add supported site value of $155,000, already reflecting any site losses. What total indicated value results?
What best supports a claimed loss from a bathroom-layout deficiency?
Improvement cost new is $1,850,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $310,000, $620,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. No site is included. What depreciated improvement amount results?
Which scenario most strongly supports giving the cost approach substantial weight?
A cost total $650,000 explicitly includes $40,000 of non-realty FF&E outside the appraised real-property interest. Exclude it. Supported realty-only total depreciation is $55,000. Add site $200,000, with no overlap. What real-property cost indication results?
A 2,200-sf dwelling costs $200 per square foot, and a separate 400-sf garage costs $75 per square foot. These costs are complete and do not overlap. Both have an effective age of 15 years and a total life of 50 years, with straight-line depreciation and no salvage value. No site value or other loss is involved. What is the combined depreciated cost of the dwelling and garage?
A new feature in the improvements has a current cost of $45,000 and a market contribution of $18,000. The entire difference is due to superadequacy, with no physical or external loss and no overlap. What is the loss from the superadequacy?
An external influence causes an annual net income loss of $9,600. The capitalization rate for the loss is 8%, and no other economic factors change. What is the indicated loss in value of the whole property, before allocation between site and improvements?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
The subject improvements have a current cost new of $650,000, an effective age of 16 years and a total economic life of 80 years. Depreciation is by the straight-line age-life method, with no salvage value or other deductions. The site value of $190,000 already reflects any site influences. What is the total indicated value, including the site?
Next Question
An appraiser uses the straight-line age-life method for improvements with a current cost new of $710,000, an effective age of 21 years and a total economic life of 70 years. An additional, separately measured depreciation amount of $35,000 is not reflected in the age-life estimate. There are no other deductions and no salvage value. What is the depreciated cost of the improvements?