Under USPAP, how may an appraiser authorize another person to affix the appraiser’s electronic signature?
Correct Answer
A) Only on an assignment-by-assignment basis, while exercising due care against unauthorized use
An appraiser may authorize use of the signature only on an assignment-by-assignment basis and must exercise due care to prevent unauthorized use. The signature recognizes and accepts the appraiser’s applicable responsibilities; authorization does not transfer those responsibilities. Another person must not affix an appraiser’s signature without consent. Meet any additional applicable law or program requirements; electronic form does not eliminate certification duties.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because USPAP states that an appraiser may authorize the use of his or her signature only on an assignment-by-assignment basis, and must exercise due care to prevent unauthorized use. The signature still represents the appraiser's acceptance of responsibility for the work.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: By giving another person permanent blanket authority for all future reports
Option B, giving another person permanent blanket authority for all future reports, conflicts with the requirement that authorization be given only on an assignment-by-assignment basis.
Option C: Never, because USPAP forbids every authorized application by another person
Option C, claiming USPAP forbids every authorized application by another person, is wrong because USPAP does allow authorized use when given assignment by assignment with due care.
Option D: By transferring all certification responsibility to the person clicking the signature
Option D, transferring all certification responsibility to the person clicking the signature, is wrong because authorizing someone to affix the signature does not shift the appraiser's responsibilities to that person.
One job, one permission
Each assignment needs its own permission to sign for you, and the responsibility stays with you.
How to use: Use this when a question involves an assistant or staff member applying an appraiser's signature.
Exam Tip
Look for the phrase assignment-by-assignment and for language keeping responsibility with the appraiser.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Granting staff standing authority to sign all reports
- -Believing USPAP prohibits any use of a signature by another person
- -Thinking the person who applies the signature takes on the certification responsibility
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests USPAP's rules on authorizing another person to affix an appraiser's signature. Authorization is allowed, but only one assignment at a time, and the appraiser must take due care against unauthorized use and keeps the responsibilities the signature represents.
Background Knowledge
A signature, written or electronic, shows that the appraiser recognizes and accepts responsibility for the certification and the work. Electronic form does not remove certification duties, and other applicable laws or program rules may add requirements.
Real-World Application
An appraiser traveling for an inspection asks an office manager to apply the electronic signature to one finished report. The appraiser authorizes that single report, keeps the signature software password-protected, and remains responsible for the report's content.
More USPAP Questions
In a cost approach for an improved property, an appraiser estimates site value by sales comparison, allocation and extraction, then settles on one site-value figure before final reconciliation. How is this step best described?
An extraordinary assumption was reasonably supported, properly used and disclosed in an appraisal report. Later, the assumed information is found to be false. Which conclusion is best supported?
An otherwise applicable valuation approach cannot be developed reliably from the available data. The remaining scope can produce credible assignment results. What should the appraiser do?
May an appraiser use a hypothetical condition in any assignment?
An appraisal has a current effective date and permits an extraordinary assumption if its requirements are met. Which situation involves uncertain information rather than a fact known to be contrary to reality on that date?
Why must a report identify any real property interest that is being excluded from the value opinion?
Which review best helps explain divergent cost, sales-comparison and income indications?
Two value indications are $340,000 and $392,000. What is the difference as a percentage of the lower indication, rounded to one decimal place?
An unauthorized third party requests a lender-client’s report. No due-process or other permitted disclosure exception applies. How should the appraiser respond?
An appraiser proposes to assume there are no hidden defects. Which fact would characterize that assumption as extraordinary under the USPAP 2024 definition, rather than justify dismissing it as routine boilerplate?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Previous Question
Before reconciling, an appraiser re-reads the engagement and finds that the assignment calls for a retrospective value as of a date 18 months ago. The cost approach was developed with current cost figures, while the comparable sales bracket the retrospective date. What is the best next step?
Next Question
An appraiser reconciling three approaches has value indications of $355,000, $362,000 and $358,000, with assigned weights of 50%, 20% and 30%, respectively. What is the weighted indication, rounded to the nearest dollar?