According to USPAP, which of the following would constitute a violation of the Ethics Rule regarding conduct?
Correct Answer
D) Accepting an assignment with a predetermined value conclusion
Accepting employment conditioned on a predetermined appraisal conclusion compromises independent judgment and is prohibited. A fee based on legitimate assignment complexity is different from an outcome-contingent arrangement. Declining because a competency gap cannot be remedied is acceptable, although the Competency Rule also permits acquiring competency under its conditions. An extraordinary assumption is permissible only when its substantive and disclosure requirements are met; disclosure alone is insufficient.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because USPAP states an appraiser must not agree to perform an assignment that includes the reporting of predetermined opinions and conclusions. Accepting such an assignment compromises the appraiser's independent judgment. It is a direct violation of the conduct requirements of the Ethics Rule.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Using an extraordinary assumption in an appraisal
Option A, using an extraordinary assumption in an appraisal, is permitted when its requirements are met, including a reasonable basis, credible analysis and proper disclosure. Properly using one is not an Ethics Rule violation.
Option B: Declining an assignment due to lack of competency
Option B, declining an assignment due to lack of competency, is acceptable conduct. The Competency Rule permits declining when a gap cannot be remedied, though it also allows acquiring competency under its conditions.
Option C: Charging a fee based on the complexity of the assignment
Option C, charging a fee based on the complexity of the assignment, is a legitimate pricing practice. It differs from a fee contingent on reporting a predetermined result or a direction in value.
No Answer Before Analysis
An appraiser finds the value through analysis, not before it. Agreeing to a preset answer is an ethics violation.
How to use: Use this phrase when a question describes a value or conclusion fixed in advance.
Exam Tip
Look for the option that compromises independence. Fees based on complexity and properly supported assumptions are ordinary practice.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Thinking any use of an extraordinary assumption violates the Ethics Rule
- -Treating complexity-based fees as contingent compensation
- -Believing declining for lack of competency is unethical
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the conduct section of the Ethics Rule. USPAP states that an appraiser must not agree to perform an assignment that includes reporting predetermined opinions and conclusions. Candidates should separate that prohibited conduct from acceptable practices like declining for competency reasons, charging fees based on complexity and properly using extraordinary assumptions.
Background Knowledge
The Ethics Rule requires appraisers to perform assignments with impartiality, objectivity and independence. Agreeing to report a predetermined result undermines the credibility of the work and misleads intended users. Fees may reflect workload and complexity but may not depend on reaching a particular outcome.
Real-World Application
A caller offers an appraiser an assignment but says the value needs to come in at a specific figure to close a deal. The appraiser explains that she cannot accept an assignment conditioned on a predetermined result. She offers to perform an independent appraisal and report whatever value the evidence supports.
More USPAP Questions
Under USPAP, what are assignment results?
The certification required by Standards Rule 2-3 must be signed by:
Under 2024 USPAP, which statement correctly combines the requirements for an oral real property appraisal report and its workfile?
An appraiser accepts an assignment involving a property type the appraiser has valued once before, years ago. Competency requires:
A Certified General appraiser is asked to value a specialized industrial property for the first time. The appraiser knows a competency gap exists before agreeing to the assignment. What is required if the appraiser proceeds?
Under 2024 USPAP Standard 1, which listed assignment element must be identified in developing a real property appraisal?
An appraiser provided an appraisal of the same property for another client 18 months ago. No confidentiality obligation prevents disclosing the fact of that service. Before agreeing to a new assignment, the appraiser must:
According to USPAP, what is the primary purpose of the Ethics Rule?
An appraiser is asked to determine 'fair market value' for an assignment. According to USPAP, the appraiser should:
Which list gives the sections of the 2024 USPAP Ethics Rule?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Related Tools
Previous Question
A Certified General appraiser is asked to value a specialized industrial property for the first time. The appraiser knows a competency gap exists before agreeing to the assignment. What is required if the appraiser proceeds?
Next Question
A comparable sold for $750,000 with a $25,000 seller concession. Verified market evidence indicates this concession increased the sale price by the full $25,000 compared with an otherwise similar cash-equivalent sale. What is the market-supported adjusted price?