A vacant suburban tract is awaiting residential development. A rancher would lease it for grazing at $8,000 a year, but the fencing, water and insurance the owner would need for that use cost $11,000 a year. How does the grazing use affect current value?
Correct Answer
B) It adds no interim-use value, because its income falls short of the expenses related to the use
An interim use contributes to current value only when its gross income exceeds the operating expenses related to the use. Grazing would bring in $8,000 but cost $11,000, so it does not contribute. Option A ignores expenses, option D says they are left out, and option C confuses an interim use with the highest and best use, which here is the coming residential development.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because the grazing income of $8,000 is less than the $11,000 of expenses the use requires. An interim use contributes to current value only when its gross income exceeds its related operating expenses.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: It adds value, because a use that produces rent contributes to the value of land in transition
Option A says any use that produces rent contributes. Rent alone is not the test; the $8,000 of rent must exceed the $11,000 of expenses tied to the use, and it does not.
Option C: It becomes the highest and best use, because grazing is the use available to the owner today
Option C makes grazing the highest and best use because it is available today. The tract is expected to convert to residential development, so grazing would be at most an interim use, not the highest and best use.
Option D: It adds about $8,000 a year of value, because expenses are left out of interim-use analysis
Option D credits about $8,000 a year and says expenses are left out of interim-use analysis. Expenses related to the use are exactly what the income is compared with, and here they exceed the income by $3,000.
Interim use must pay its way
An interim use adds value only if it covers its own costs and leaves something over.
How to use: Use this test when a question asks whether a temporary use adds to the value of land in transition.
Exam Tip
Compare the interim income with the expenses caused by that use. If expenses are higher, the use does not contribute even though it produces rent.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Treating any rent as added value
- -Ignoring expenses caused by the interim use
- -Calling the interim use the highest and best use
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
The question tests when an interim use adds value. The comparison is between the income the use produces and the expenses it causes. A use that costs more than it earns does not contribute, even though it produces rent.
Background Knowledge
An interim use is the use of a parcel before it converts to its future highest and best use. It contributes to current property value if the income it generates exceeds the operating expenses related to the use, as interim farming often does on land awaiting development.
Real-World Application
A landowner holding a tract for future subdivision asks whether leasing it for pasture would raise its appraised value. The appraiser finds that the fencing and water system the lease requires would cost more each year than the rent, so the pasture use adds nothing.
More Market Questions
In market area analysis, what characteristic distinguishes a district from a neighborhood?
Under USPAP Standards Rule 1-3(a), which item must an appraiser identify and analyze when necessary for credible results in a market value assignment?
How does the Fannie Mae Selling Guide define a neighborhood?
Several homes in a neighborhood are vacant and boarded up. Which market force does Fannie Mae classify this as?
Infrastructure investment such as a new interchange typically affects nearby land by:
A city raises property tax rates and tightens building regulations. Which market force does Fannie Mae classify these as?
An appraiser believes, without market evidence, that a nearby group home lowers values. What does Fannie Mae require?
Which three categories are used to report the supply of properties in a Fannie Mae neighborhood section?
An appraiser is asked for a retrospective value opinion as of three years ago. When must the appraiser meet the Competency Rule?
Can mixed land uses in a residential neighborhood ever enhance home values, according to Fannie Mae?
People Also Study
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam