Comparable loss rates are 8%,9% and 7.5%; subject history is 5%. What process best supports a stabilized allowance?
Correct Answer
B) Weigh comparability and subject conditions, then explain an estimate.
Neither an unweighted mean nor a historical rate is automatically the correct stabilized allowance. Reconcile relevant market observations and the subject’s supported performance and lease characteristics. A weighted average may help, but the stem provides no weights or rule requiring that particular numerical method.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because a stabilized allowance should reflect the level expected once transitory conditions cease, which requires weighing the comparables' relevance and the subject's supported performance and lease characteristics. The appraiser then explains the reasoning behind the selected rate. No single mechanical formula is dictated by the facts given.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Use the subject’s 5%, because it is historical data.
Option A, adopting the subject's 5% because it is historical data, ignores that past performance may reflect transitory conditions and differs noticeably from the market evidence of 7.5% to 9%. Historical data is relevant but is not by itself the stabilized allowance.
Option C: Take an automatic midpoint of the rates without examining the evidence.
Option C, taking a midpoint of the rates without examining the evidence, is a mechanical shortcut that skips the analysis of comparability and subject conditions. A midpoint might coincide with a reasonable estimate, but without analysis it is not supported.
Option D: Use a simple mean, because three market observations exist.
Option D, using a simple mean because three market observations exist, treats each observation as equally relevant and ignores the subject's own history. The number of observations does not establish that an unweighted average is the right method.
Weigh, then explain
For stabilized allowances, the appraiser weighs the market evidence and the subject's conditions, then explains the result. Shortcuts skip the weighing.
How to use: Use this when a question offers a formula-only shortcut versus a reasoned reconciliation.
Exam Tip
When answer choices offer a mechanical calculation versus a reasoned reconciliation of evidence, the reasoned process is typically the best-supported answer for a stabilized estimate.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Adopting the subject's historical rate without testing it against the market
- -Averaging market rates without considering comparability
- -Choosing a rate without explaining the reasoning
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests how an appraiser reconciles market loss rates with a subject's own history to estimate a stabilized vacancy and collection allowance. The subject's 5% is well below the comparables' 7.5% to 9%, so neither number can simply be adopted without analysis. The sound approach weighs how comparable each data point is and the subject's own conditions, then explains the chosen estimate.
Background Knowledge
Stabilized occupancy is the level expected when transitory market conditions cease to exist. Appraisers estimate vacancy and collection loss by considering market data from competing properties and the subject's own operating history, then reconciling them. The reasoning behind the selected allowance should be explained in the report.
Real-World Application
An appraiser reviewing an apartment complex finds the owner reports 5% loss, while competing complexes run 7.5% to 9%. The appraiser investigates whether the subject's low loss reflects a temporary condition or durable advantages, then selects and explains a stabilized allowance.
More Income Approach Questions
Which model describes yield capitalization of property benefits?
An appraiser is valuing a duplex. A market survey of recent duplex sales reports prices at 10.8 times potential gross income, with stabilized vacancy and credit loss of 10% of PGI and no other income. The subject's rent schedule is unavailable, but the property manager's records show collected income of $54,000 a year, in line with market rent and the 10% market loss. What value is indicated?
The subject property is a fourplex with annual EGI of $72,000 and operating expenses of $28,800. Of those expenses, $18,000 is fixed and $10,800 varies in direct proportion to EGI. The owner's annual mortgage payments are $21,000. An appraiser projects that EGI will fall 10% because of higher vacancy. What is the projected NOI?
Annual NOI available for debt service is $168,000 and total annual mortgage principal and interest debt service is $120,000. What is NOI ÷ debt service?
Annual PGI is $250,000 and combined vacancy and collection loss is explicitly 12% of that same PGI base. There is no other income. What annual EGI remains?
Annual PGI is $360,000 and combined vacancy and collection loss is explicitly 8% of that same PGI base. There is no other income. What annual EGI remains?
Annual PGI is $640,000. Combined vacancy and collection loss is 6.25% of PGI. There is no other income. What EGI remains?
An appraiser is updating a prior appraisal of a triplex with potential gross income of $60,000 and no other income. The prior appraisal used vacancy and credit loss of 5% of PGI, and a new survey of competing rentals indicates 8%. The operating expenses of $24,000 are property taxes, insurance and contract services that do not vary with occupancy, and the market overall rate remains 7.5%. By what percentages do effective gross income and indicated value decrease?
Annual potential rental income is $600,000 and vacancy loss alone is $36,000. What percentage of potential rent does that loss represent?
In the subject's market, lenders on fourplexes have lowered their typical loan-to-value ratio from 70% to 60%. The annual mortgage constant remains 5% and the equity dividend rate remains 10%. The subject's NOI has not changed. How does this affect the overall rate indicated by the band of investment and the indicated value?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Previous Question
The subject property is a fourplex with projected annual NOI of $55,000. A similar fourplex recently sold for $720,000. The seller's reported NOI of $60,000 included a one-time insurance recovery of $12,000 that the buyer did not expect to recur. What is the indicated value of the subject by direct capitalization?
Next Question
Market evidence shows property A has lower income risk than B, with identical growth expectations and other relevant cash-flow conditions. What cap-rate direction is consistent with that evidence?