A site is leased at a market ground rent of $24,000 per year. The market land capitalization rate is 6%. What land value does ground rent capitalization indicate?
Correct Answer
A) $400,000
Ground rent capitalization divides the ground rent by the land capitalization rate: $24,000 ÷ 0.06 = $400,000. Because ground rent is income to the land alone, nothing is deducted for improvements.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because ground rent capitalization converts ground rent into land value by dividing by the land capitalization rate. The calculation is $24,000 ÷ 0.06 = $400,000.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: $144,000
Option B, $144,000, multiplies the rent by the rate as a whole number: $24,000 × 6 = $144,000. Capitalization divides income by the rate, $24,000 ÷ 0.06 = $400,000.
Option C: $1,440
Option C, $1,440, multiplies the rent by the rate instead of dividing: $24,000 × 0.06 = $1,440. That is a 6% return on the rent, not a value; the correct result is $24,000 ÷ 0.06 = $400,000.
Option D: $40,000
Option D, $40,000, results from a decimal error, dividing by 0.6 instead of 0.06: $24,000 ÷ 0.6 = $40,000. The correct result is $400,000.
IRV: Income over Rate
Value = Income ÷ Rate. Ground rent is the income, the land rate is the rate.
How to use: Use IRV to set up any direct capitalization problem.
Exam Tip
Convert percentages to decimals before dividing, and check that the value is much larger than the annual rent.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Multiplying income by the rate instead of dividing
- -Using 0.6 instead of 0.06 for 6%
- -Deducting building income from ground rent
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests ground rent capitalization. Ground rent is income to the land alone, so it is divided directly by the land capitalization rate. No deduction for improvements is needed.
Background Knowledge
Ground rent is paid for the use of land under a ground lease. Capitalizing a market ground rent at a market land capitalization rate indicates land value, using the basic income formula value = income ÷ rate.
Real-World Application
An appraiser values a parcel leased to a restaurant operator under a long-term ground lease at market rent. She derives a land capitalization rate from comparable ground lease sales and divides the rent by it to indicate land value.
More Land/Site Questions
How should an appraiser account for a site's access to public sewer compared with competing sites that require septic systems?
Which fact, if supported by competitive-market evidence, most directly supports a unit-price premium for an otherwise comparable site?
A rectangular site's frontage is doubled while its depth is halved, keeping area constant. What is the likely value effect in a retail district?
A downtown site's zoning height limit is reduced from six stories to three. Buyers in this market had been paying for six-story development potential. What effect on land value is most supportable?
A zoning change increases permitted density from four to eight units per acre. What is the likely effect on site value?
Using the allocation method, market evidence supports a typical land-to-total-property-value ratio of 28% for similar improved properties in the subject’s location. An improved comparable sold for $825,000. What land (site) contribution is indicated by applying that ratio?
An appraiser is valuing a vacant site near a landfill. A similar vacant site that is not affected by the landfill sold for $480,000. Paired land sales indicate that proximity to the landfill lowers site prices by $70,000. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated value of the subject site?
An appraiser is extracting site value from a $600,000 cash sale. The seller's records show an original construction cost of $250,000 and a depreciated book value of $110,000. The appraiser estimates current replacement cost new at $400,000 and accrued depreciation from all causes at $100,000. What is the indicated site value?
Three parcels assembled under single ownership (standard appraisal guidance assemblage) support separate as-is values of $290,000, $340,000, and $250,000. After assemblage for a higher-utility use, the combined site is valued at $1,050,000. Assemblage costs (demolition, legal, holding, and related) total $55,000. What is the indicated net plottage (plottage increment after assemblage costs)?
A comparable commercial site with 65 front feet sold for a cash-equivalent price of $585,000. Per standard appraisal guidance, sale price per front foot is a vacant-land unit of comparison when frontage is a primary value determinant. The subject site has 72 front feet and is otherwise similar. What indicated land value does the front-foot unit support before other adjustments?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
A percolation test fails on a rural site with no public sewer. What should the appraiser do?
Next Question
A vacant site being appraised is encumbered by a utility easement. A comparable vacant site without the easement sold for $370,000. Paired land sales indicate a $48,000 discount for the easement. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated value of the subject land?
