EstatePass
appraisal-statistical-methodsmedium

A sample that systematically excludes part of the population produces:

Correct Answer

D) Biased results regardless of sample size

Why this is correct: The correct answer is "Biased results regardless of sample size." Bias is a systematic error in the sampling method that excludes a segment of the population. This error is directional and does not diminish by simply increasing the sample size; a larger sample of a systematically flawed group will still produce a biased estimate. The original explanation correctly notes that bias is a direction, not a magnitude, and more observations of the wrong population do not correct the fundamental flaw. Why the other choices are wrong: "Results identical to a census" is wrong because a census includes the entire population, while this sample excludes part of it, so the results will differ. "More precise estimates than a random sample" is wrong because systematic exclusion introduces bias, which reduces accuracy; a properly drawn random sample is generally more reliable. "Errors that shrink as the sample grows" is wrong because the systematic error (bias) persists regardless of sample size; increasing the sample only reduces random sampling error, not bias. Exam tip: Remember the key distinction: increasing sample size reduces random error, but it cannot fix a biased sampling method.

Answer Options
A
Results identical to a census
B
More precise estimates than a random sample
C
Errors that shrink as the sample grows
D
Biased results regardless of sample size

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Why this is correct: The correct answer is "Biased results regardless of sample size." Bias is a systematic error in the sampling method that excludes a segment of the population. This error is directional and does not diminish by simply increasing the sample size; a larger sample of a systematically flawed group will still produce a biased estimate. The original explanation correctly notes that bias is a direction, not a magnitude, and more observations of the wrong population do not correct the fundamental flaw. Why the other choices are wrong: "Results identical to a census" is wrong because a census includes the entire population, while this sample excludes part of it, so the results will differ. "More precise estimates than a random sample" is wrong because systematic exclusion introduces bias, which reduces accuracy; a properly drawn random sample is generally more reliable. "Errors that shrink as the sample grows" is wrong because the systematic error (bias) persists regardless of sample size; increasing the sample only reduces random sampling error, not bias. Exam tip: Remember the key distinction: increasing sample size reduces random error, but it cannot fix a biased sampling method.

Was this explanation helpful?

More appraisal-statistical-methods Questions

A price index rises from 100 to 121 over two years. What compound annual rate does this represent?

A sample of four sales drawn from a market with 200 annual transactions is:

A set of comparable sales has a mean of $250,000 and a standard deviation of $20,000. What is the coefficient of variation?

A property sold for $400,000 and resold three years later for $463,050 with no physical change. What compound annual rate does this indicate?

An appraiser includes both 'total room count' and 'bedroom count' as independent variables in a regression model estimating single-family home sale prices. The variance inflation factor (VIF) for 'bedroom count' is calculated as 12.3. What is the most appropriate appraisal action based on this result?

An appraiser runs a regression of sale price on GLA, age, and a binary variable for 'renovated' (1 = yes, 0 = no). The estimated coefficient for 'renovated' is $18,400 with a standard error of $6,200 and a t-statistic of 2.97. Assuming a two-tailed test at Ξ± = 0.05 and 42 degrees of freedom, what conclusion is supported regarding the market's recognition of renovations?

To validate the functional form of a regression model used for adjustments, an appraiser plots residuals against predicted values and observes a clear inverted-U pattern. What does this pattern indicate, and what is the most defensible corrective action?

A histogram of neighborhood sale prices shows two distinct peaks. What does this most likely mean?

What does it mean to validate a regression model?

An appraiser includes months elapsed since each sale as a variable in a price model. What is this intended to capture?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing